Screening program in ovarian cancer: A logical step in clinical management? A meta-analysis.

Author: Benedetti PaniciPierluigi, De FeliceFrancesca, LecceFrancesca, MarchettiClaudia, MontiMarco, MusioDaniela, MuziiLudovico, PerniolaGiorgia, TomboliniVincenzo, VertechyLaura

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) is a challenge and its poor prognosis still remains a problem of major importance. Due to the lack of early and specific symptoms, the vast majority of women are diagnosed with an advanced stage disease. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of OC s...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.12.005

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Ovarian Cancer Screening: A Logical Step in Clinical Management?

The battle against ovarian cancer is a constant quest for effective screening and treatment strategies. This study delved into the world of ovarian cancer screening, evaluating its impact on clinical outcomes. The authors conducted a meta-analysis of existing research, examining the benefits and limitations of screening programs in asymptomatic women. Their goal was to assess the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of screening in improving detection and treatment outcomes.

The Challenge of Ovarian Cancer Screening

The meta-analysis highlighted the challenges of developing effective screening programs for ovarian cancer. While screening can potentially improve early detection, the study found limited evidence supporting its overall impact on clinical outcomes. It also noted the potential for false-positive results, leading to unnecessary anxiety and invasive procedures.

The Need for Continued Research

This research underscores the need for continued research and development of more effective screening strategies for ovarian cancer. The study's findings highlight the importance of weighing the potential benefits and limitations of screening programs, ensuring that they are implemented responsibly and ethically.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This meta-analysis serves as a valuable reminder of the complexity of cancer screening, highlighting the ongoing search for more effective and reliable methods to detect and treat this devastating disease. It's like navigating a desert—understanding the terrain, its challenges, and its potential rewards is crucial for a successful journey.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-04-23
  2. Date Revised 2019-04-23
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

29433824

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.12.005

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.