Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Surgical Excision Versus Ablation for Superficial Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Author: BentonAndrea S, DeimlingTimothy A, HarkinsGerald J, KunselmanAllen R, RileyKristin A
Original Abstract of the Article :
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical excision and ablation of endometriosis for treatment of chronic pelvic pain. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with 12-month follow-up (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Single academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Women with minimal to mild...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.023
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Surgical Excision Versus Ablation for Superficial Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Comparative Study
This study delves into the complex world of gynecology, specifically focusing on the treatment of pain associated with superficial endometriosis. The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of surgical excision and ablation in treating chronic pelvic pain in women with minimal to mild endometriosis. The study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of both surgical approaches on various pain parameters, including menstrual pain, nonmenstrual pain, dyspareunia, and dyschezia. The findings revealed that ablation resulted in significant improvement in dysmenorrhea at 6 and 12 months and dyspareunia at 6 months, while excision did not show significant improvements. Overall, both treatments demonstrated similar effectiveness in treating pain associated with superficial endometriosis, with ablation showing more significant individual changes.Surgical Approaches for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Comparative Analysis
This study provides valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of surgical excision and ablation in treating pain associated with superficial endometriosis. The findings highlight the potential benefits of ablation in achieving significant improvements in certain pain parameters, particularly dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. While both approaches showed similar overall effectiveness, the study's findings suggest that ablation may offer a more tailored approach for addressing specific pain symptoms.Endometriosis: A Journey Towards Pain Relief
This study underscores the importance of individualized treatment approaches in managing endometriosis-associated pain. The research comparing excision and ablation highlights the potential benefits of tailored surgical strategies for addressing specific pain symptoms. Patients with endometriosis should work closely with a gynecologist to develop a comprehensive treatment plan that best addresses their individual needs and aims to achieve long-term pain relief.Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This research is like a guiding compass in the vast desert of endometriosis-associated pain. It highlights the potential benefits of ablation over excision in achieving significant improvements in certain pain parameters. Just as a camel uses a compass to navigate the desert, patients with endometriosis can use this research to find the right treatment path towards improved health and well-being.Date :
- Date Completed 2019-08-06
- Date Revised 2019-08-06
Further Info :
Related Literature
Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages
English
Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.