The effectiveness of magnetic stimulation for patients with pelvic floor dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author: BaoYong, CaoHonghao, JinRongjiang, PanHong, WangPu, ZhangJunmei

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
AIMS: To evaluate the value of magnetic stimulation (MS) in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed. We searched five databases for articles published until November 2017. Included s...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23797

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Magnetic Stimulation for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Journey Through the Desert of Evidence

The desert of medical research is vast and constantly evolving, often leading us to new and promising therapies. Magnetic stimulation (MS) has emerged as a potential treatment for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), a condition that can significantly impact quality of life. This study, like a well-equipped caravan, explores the effectiveness of MS for PFD, navigating through the landscape of available research.

The Quest for Definitive Evidence

The researchers, like meticulous desert explorers, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effects of MS on PFD. Their findings, like a mirage in the desert, revealed that the evidence supporting the benefits of MS for PFD is currently inconclusive. The study highlights the need for larger, well-designed trials with longer follow-up periods to provide more definitive answers.

The Importance of Rigorous Research

This study underscores the importance of rigorous research in guiding clinical practice. It’s a reminder that in the desert of medicine, we must rely on robust evidence to make informed decisions about treatment. This study provides valuable insights for both clinicians and patients as they navigate the complex world of PFD and explore potential treatment options.

Dr. Camel’s Conclusion

This study, like a captivating desert tale, highlights the ongoing journey to unravel the mysteries of pelvic floor dysfunction and identify effective treatments. It reminds us that the desert of medical research is a constant source of both hope and challenge, requiring a commitment to rigorous inquiry and a dedication to improving patient outcomes.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-10-07
  2. Date Revised 2019-10-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30221818

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1002/nau.23797

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.