Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.

Author: ChuChuanmin, CuiXingang, HongTian Yu, HuChuanyi, JiangNing, LiGang, ZhangHe, ZhaoJun Long

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

UMP, FURS, and SWL are all safe and effective in the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole kidney stones, with UMP and FURS having better stone-free rates than SWL.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of new percutaneous technique ("ultra-mini PCNL", UMP), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) on the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole kidney stones, and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1159/000493508

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Kidney Stones: Navigating the Treatment Desert

This research delves into the world of kidney stones, those pesky little mineral formations that can cause significant pain and discomfort. The authors compared three different surgical techniques – ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP), flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) – for treating lower pole kidney stones, which are those located in the lower part of the kidney.

Finding the Right Path: Comparing Treatment Options

The study found that UMP and FURS were more effective than SWL in removing kidney stones. However, UMP was associated with a longer hospital stay and more complications than the other two methods. FURS, while effective, had a longer operating time. SWL, while less effective, had the lowest cost and invasiveness. It's like choosing the right path through a desert: each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Kidney Stones: A Desert of Discomfort

The study provides valuable information for healthcare professionals to choose the most appropriate treatment approach for kidney stones, based on individual patient factors and stone characteristics.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study sheds light on the effectiveness of different surgical techniques for kidney stones. It's like having a map to guide you through the desert of kidney stone treatment options. The choice of treatment depends on a careful consideration of the patient's individual needs and the specific characteristics of the kidney stone.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-07-24
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-24
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30352443

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1159/000493508

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of kidney stones
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.