This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of kidney stones: A Synthesis of Findings from 20 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of kidney stones: A Synthesis of Findings from 20 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Various methods are used to treat kidney stones. 18 , 11 , and 8 show that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is effective in treating large and complex stones. 17 states that drug therapy may be effective depending on the type of stone. 16 examines a treatment method that adjusts the position of lower pole stones. 2 compares extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of lower pole stones. 14 examines the treatment of asymptomatic small stones in kidney transplant donors. 10 examines the duration of antibiotic administration after PCNL for infection stones. 7 examines the effectiveness of hydrochlorothiazide in preventing the recurrence of calcium nephrolithiasis. 6 compares the effectiveness of ultra-mini PCNL, SWL, and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole kidney stones. 19 compares the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in the supine and prone positions in a pediatric population. 5 performs a network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of various surgical methods in treating renal calculi. 9 examines the association of UTIs in patients with KSD and assesses the outcomes of kidney stone treatment in the resolution of rUTI. 15 compares PCNL and RIRS for the treatment of renal stones in adults. 1 examines the cost-effectiveness of ESWL and PCNL for medium-sized kidney stones. 13 re-evaluates the best evidence on this topic in an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2014. 20 compares the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit. 12 discusses the metabolic changes in kidney stone disease. 3 examines the effectiveness of citrate salts for preventing and treating calcium-containing kidney stones. 4 compares the one-shot procedure and the sequential metal dilation procedure in PCNL.

Treatment Summary

Kidney stone treatment involves surgical procedures such as ESWL, PCNL, and RIRS, as well as drug therapy and lifestyle modifications. 18 compares performing PCNL simultaneously on both sides with performing it in stages, suggesting that simultaneous bilateral surgery may shorten surgery time, anesthesia time, post-operative pain, and hospital stay. 17 states that drug therapy may be effective depending on the type of stone. 7 examines the effectiveness of hydrochlorothiazide in preventing the recurrence of calcium nephrolithiasis. 12 discusses the metabolic changes in kidney stone disease. 3 examines the effectiveness of citrate salts for preventing and treating calcium-containing kidney stones.

Benefits and Risks

Benefit Summary

Kidney stone treatment methods vary depending on the type, size, and location of the stones. 18 , 8 , and 19 show that PCNL is effective in treating large and complex stones. 18 suggests that performing PCNL simultaneously on both sides may shorten surgery time, anesthesia time, post-operative pain, and hospital stay. 17 shows that drug therapy has the advantages of being less expensive, less invasive, and more readily available than surgery. 7 suggests that hydrochlorothiazide may be effective in preventing the recurrence of calcium nephrolithiasis. 12 shows that understanding metabolic changes may lead to the development of new therapies. 3 suggests that citrate salts may be effective in preventing and treating calcium-containing kidney stones. These findings show that there are various options for kidney stone treatment and that it is essential to choose the appropriate treatment method based on the patient's condition.

Risk Summary

Various risks are associated with kidney stone treatment. 18 reports bleeding, infection, and urinary obstruction as complications of PCNL. 17 reports gastrointestinal symptoms and electrolyte abnormalities as side effects of drug therapy. 12 shows that metabolic changes are deeply involved in the development of kidney stones. 3 reports gastrointestinal symptoms and exacerbation of kidney stones as side effects of citrate salts. These findings show that it is essential to fully understand the risks and benefits of kidney stone treatment and to choose the appropriate treatment method in consultation with a physician.

Comparison Between Studies

Common Points of the Studies

Multiple studies show that surgical methods such as ESWL, PCNL, and RIRS and drug therapy are used to treat kidney stones. 18 , 11 , 8 , 19 , and 13 show that PCNL is effective in treating large and complex stones. 17 , 7 , and 3 suggest that drug therapy may be effective in preventing and treating stones.

Differences Between the Studies

The type, size, and location of stones, the treatment method, and the evaluation criteria vary depending on the study. 18 compares performing PCNL simultaneously on both sides with performing it in stages, but other studies do not make such a comparison. 16 examines a treatment method that adjusts the position of lower pole stones, but other studies do not make such an examination. 14 examines the treatment of asymptomatic small stones in kidney transplant donors, but other studies do not make such an examination. 10 examines the duration of antibiotic administration after PCNL for infection stones, but other studies do not make such an examination. 6 compares the effectiveness of ultra-mini PCNL, SWL, and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole kidney stones, but other studies do not make such a comparison. 5 performs a network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of various surgical methods in treating renal calculi, but other studies do not perform such an analysis. 9 examines the association of UTIs in patients with KSD and assesses the outcomes of kidney stone treatment in the resolution of rUTI, but other studies do not make such an examination. 15 compares PCNL and RIRS for the treatment of renal stones in adults, but other studies do not make such a comparison. 1 examines the cost-effectiveness of ESWL and PCNL for medium-sized kidney stones, but other studies do not make such an examination. 20 compares the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit, but other studies do not make such a comparison. 4 compares the one-shot procedure and the sequential metal dilation procedure in PCNL, but other studies do not make such a comparison.

Consistency and Contradictions in the Results

Multiple studies show that PCNL is effective in treating large and complex stones. However, 18 suggests that performing PCNL simultaneously on both sides may shorten surgery time, anesthesia time, post-operative pain, and hospital stay, but other studies do not make such a comparison. Also, 17 , 7 , and 3 suggest that drug therapy may be effective in preventing and treating stones, but these studies all target calcium-containing kidney stones, and further research is needed on the effects of drug therapy on other types of stones. Also, 12 shows that metabolic changes are deeply involved in the development of kidney stones, but this study is only a consideration and has not led to the development of specific therapies. These findings show that there are various options for kidney stone treatment and that it is essential to choose the appropriate treatment method based on the patient's condition.

Precautions for Application in Real Life

The following points should be noted when choosing a kidney stone treatment method: * Type, size, and location of stones * Age, gender, and co-morbidities of the patient * Risks and benefits of the treatment method * Patient's wishes It is essential to discuss these points with a physician and choose the appropriate treatment method.

Limitations of Current Research

Current research has the following limitations: * Many studies are small, and it is necessary to be cautious about generalizing the results. * Comparing results can be difficult because the studies have different designs and evaluation criteria. * Many studies target specific types of kidney stones, and further research is needed on therapies for other types of stones. To overcome these limitations, larger studies and studies with standardized designs are needed.

Future Directions for Needed Research

Future research on kidney stone treatment should focus on the following areas: * Development of new therapies * Further evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of existing therapies * Research to improve patient quality of life * Research on kidney stone prevention Through this research, we can expect to improve kidney stone treatments and improve patient quality of life.

Conclusion

Kidney stones are a condition that affects many people worldwide. 18 , 17 , 7 , 12 , and 3 are some of the studies that have been conducted, but there is still room for improvement in the development and improvement of therapies. Kidney stone treatment methods vary depending on the type, size, and location of the stones, as well as the patient's age, gender, and co-morbidities. 18 , 11 , 8 , 19 , and 13 show that PCNL is effective in treating large and complex stones. 17 , 7 , and 3 suggest that drug therapy may be effective in preventing and treating stones. Various risks are associated with kidney stone treatment. 18 , 17 , 12 , and 3 mention the risks of surgery and drug therapy. When choosing a kidney stone treatment method, it is crucial to consult with a physician and choose a therapy that is suitable for your condition.

Treatment List

ESWL, PCNL, RIRS, Drug therapy, Urine pH adjustment, Hydrochlorothiazide, Citrate salts, Lifestyle modifications


Literature analysis of 20 papers
Positive Content
20
Neutral Content
0
Negative Content
0
Article Type
8
4
6
6
19

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : Spanish


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.