Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.

Author: AbenKatja Kh, BangmaChris H, ClevesAnne, DahmPhilipp, LanceeMichelle, VernooijRobin Wm

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Prostate cancer is common, but often grows slowly. Surgery to remove the prostate (radical prostatectomy) can cure it, but has side effects. Waiting and treating only if the cancer progresses (watchful waiting/active monitoring) is another option. This review updates previous research to consider the latest evidence on these approaches.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Prostate cancer is a common cancer but is oftentimes slow growing. When confined to the prostate, radical prostatectomy (RP), which involves removal of the prostate, offers potential cure that may come at the price of adverse events. Deferred treatment, involving observation and palliative treatment...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270852/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Crossroads of Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Choice Between Radical Prostatectomy and Deferred Treatment

Prostate cancer, a common malignancy, often presents a challenging dilemma for men: whether to opt for immediate surgical intervention or to delay treatment. This research explores the trade-offs involved in choosing between radical prostatectomy (RP), a surgical procedure that removes the prostate gland, and deferred treatment strategies. The authors delve into the decision-making process, highlighting the potential benefits and risks associated with each approach. Deferred treatment strategies, such as watchful waiting (WW) or active monitoring (AM)/surveillance (AS), involve close observation and delaying local treatment until disease progression necessitates it. The authors acknowledge the importance of considering the individual patient's characteristics, such as age, risk factors, and disease stage, when making treatment decisions.

A Balancing Act: Weighing the Benefits and Risks of Treatment Options

This research provides a comprehensive overview of the choices involved in treating localized prostate cancer, underscoring the importance of individualizing treatment plans. The authors present a balanced perspective on the benefits and risks of both radical prostatectomy and deferred treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of factors such as age, risk factors, and disease stage.

The Path to Personalized Care: Making Informed Decisions

This research emphasizes the importance of shared decision-making between doctors and patients when choosing treatment options for prostate cancer. A thorough understanding of the benefits and risks associated with both radical prostatectomy and deferred treatment strategies is crucial for navigating the complex landscape of prostate cancer care.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research sheds light on the crossroads of prostate cancer treatment, offering a valuable guide for men facing this challenging diagnosis. By highlighting the benefits and risks of both radical prostatectomy and deferred treatment strategies, the authors emphasize the importance of personalized care and informed decision-making in this complex arena.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2020-07-24
  2. Date Revised 2021-09-03
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

32495338

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC7270852

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of prostate cancer
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.