Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Implementation of meta-analysis approach, comparing conventional radiotherapy, and proton beam therapy treating head and neck cancer.

Author: KaleLata M, SaleemHuma Md, ShaikhFirdous, SodhiSonia Kaur, TalibYusuf A

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.

Overview

Radiation therapy is a common treatment for head and neck cancer. Proton therapy, a newer type of radiation, can target the cancer more precisely while reducing the amount of radiation exposure to healthy tissues.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Radiation therapy is commonly used in the treatment of head and neck cancer in both the definitive and postoperative settings. Proton therapy, due to its intrinsic physical properties, has the ability to reduce the integral dose delivered to the patients while maintaining highly conformal target cov...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_111_19

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Implementation of meta-analysis approach, comparing conventional radiotherapy, and proton beam therapy treating head and neck cancer.

This research tackles a significant challenge in the treatment of head and neck cancer by comparing conventional radiotherapy and proton beam therapy. Think of this as comparing two different paths across a vast desert, each with its own advantages and drawbacks.

What Does This Research Suggest?

This research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence comparing conventional radiotherapy and proton beam therapy for head and neck cancer. This meta-analysis, which combines data from multiple studies, is like carefully mapping out the paths across the desert, gathering insights from various explorers to create a more comprehensive understanding of the terrain.

Implications for Your Health and Lifestyle

This research provides valuable information for patients with head and neck cancer and their healthcare providers. It offers insights into the potential benefits and risks of different treatment options, helping to guide decision-making for personalized care. It's like choosing the most suitable path across the desert, taking into account the specific needs and preferences of each traveler.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research on head and neck cancer treatment options sheds light on the important considerations involved in choosing the right path towards recovery. It's like having a trusted guide to navigate the challenging terrain of cancer treatment, ensuring that the journey is as safe and effective as possible.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2020-10-29
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-15
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

32719273

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_111_19

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of radiation therapy
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.