Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Clinical treatment of hypertrophic scars (HSs) and keloids is often unsatisfactory. Intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and verapamil are widely used to treat HSs and keloids, but their efficacy and safety are controversial. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa357

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Intralesional Verapamil vs. Triamcinolone Acetonide: A Meta-Analysis of Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid Treatment

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are like stubborn desert sand dunes, resistant to change. This meta-analysis, like a compass guiding us through the landscape of scar treatment, compares the efficacy and safety of two commonly used treatments: intralesional verapamil and triamcinolone acetonide. Researchers pooled data from seven randomized controlled trials to determine which treatment is more effective and safe for reducing the height, pigmentation, and vascularity of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Their findings suggest that verapamil might be a suitable alternative to triamcinolone acetonide, offering similar efficacy with fewer side effects.

Verapamil Emerges as a Potential Substitute

While triamcinolone acetonide initially showed faster improvements in scar height and pliability, the meta-analysis found that verapamil achieved similar results with continued treatment. Furthermore, verapamil was associated with a significantly lower risk of telangiectasia and skin atrophy, two common side effects of triamcinolone acetonide. This suggests that verapamil might be a more favorable option, offering a similar level of efficacy with a potentially lower risk of unwanted side effects.

Choosing the Right Treatment

This research provides valuable insights into the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids, helping us navigate the complex landscape of scar management. By understanding the relative benefits and risks of different treatment options, we can make more informed decisions about the best course of action for individual patients. It's like choosing the right path in the desert to avoid potential pitfalls and reach a destination of improved scar appearance.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides valuable guidance for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. Verapamil's potential as a safe and effective alternative to triamcinolone acetonide is like finding a more comfortable and scenic route across the desert of scar management. It's a reminder that seeking out alternative solutions and understanding the risks and benefits of different treatments is essential for achieving optimal outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-06-08
  2. Date Revised 2021-06-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

33313652

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1093/asj/sjaa357

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.