Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Cimetidine versus intensive antacid therapy for duodenal ulcer: a multicenter trial.
Author: BinderM, CamachoR, CanoR, CooneyC, IppolitiA F, IsenbergJ I, KlineM M, KoretzR L, MeyerJ H, SamloffI M, SchwabeA D, StromE A, SturdevantR A, ValenzuelaJ E, WintroubR H
Original Abstract of the Article :
In a randomized double blind multicenter trial, patients treated with cimetidine (800 or 1200 mg daily) or an intensive regimen of Al-Mg antacid (210 ml daily) had similar rates of duodenal ulcer healing and pain relief. After 4 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients with ulcer healing by en...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/340327
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Cimetidine versus intensive antacid therapy for duodenal ulcer
Duodenal ulcers, a common ailment that can cause discomfort and disrupt daily life, have long been a subject of research. This study delves into the world of duodenal ulcer treatment, comparing the effectiveness of cimetidine, a medication that blocks histamine receptors, and intensive antacid therapy. The researchers conducted a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, a meticulously designed expedition through the sands of medical research, to investigate the relative efficacy of these treatments. Their findings, a treasure trove of data, revealed that cimetidine and intensive antacid therapy had similar rates of ulcer healing and pain relief. This discovery, like uncovering a hidden oasis in the desert, offers valuable insights for treating duodenal ulcers.
Finding the right approach for duodenal ulcers
The study's findings provide healthcare providers with valuable insights into the treatment of duodenal ulcers. The results indicate that both cimetidine and intensive antacid therapy are effective options for healing ulcers and relieving pain. The discovery that these two approaches have similar efficacy is a significant finding, akin to finding two different paths leading to the same destination in the vast desert. This knowledge empowers healthcare providers to choose the treatment option that best suits their patients' needs and preferences.
Understanding the complexities of duodenal ulcer treatment
The study's findings also highlight the complexities of duodenal ulcer treatment. While both cimetidine and intensive antacid therapy were effective, they differed in terms of side effects. The study observed that a significant proportion of patients receiving intensive antacid therapy experienced diarrhea. This finding underscores the importance of carefully considering potential side effects when choosing a treatment approach. It's a reminder that even in the desert, where resources are limited, careful planning and consideration for the terrain are essential for a successful journey.
Dr.Camel's Conclusion
This study, a testament to the tireless pursuit of medical knowledge, provides valuable insights into the treatment of duodenal ulcers. The researchers' findings, like a well-charted oasis in the desert of digestive health, demonstrate the effectiveness of both cimetidine and intensive antacid therapy. The study serves as a reminder that, just as a skilled traveler navigates the desert with a keen understanding of the terrain, healthcare providers must approach treatment with careful consideration for individual needs and potential side effects.
Date :
- Date Completed 1978-03-29
- Date Revised 2018-11-30
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.