Cimetidine and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer: a multicenter double blind study.

Author: BelsitoA, DickinsonP B, DyckW P, FleshlerB, LiebermannT R, WoodJ M

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
A randomized, prospective, multicenter trial of the effects of cimetidine on benign gastric ulcer was conducted in 60 outpatients. Endoscopic assessment was used as the criterion for healing. Although none of the differences was statistically significant, mean healing rates were higher and mean decr...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/340331

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Cimetidine: A Potential Helper for Gastric Ulcers?

In the vast desert of medical research, we're constantly searching for oases of healing. This study delves into the realm of gastrointestinal ailments, specifically focusing on the effectiveness of cimetidine in treating benign gastric ulcers. The researchers, like intrepid explorers, embarked on a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involving 60 outpatients. They used endoscopic assessment, a powerful tool for peering into the depths of the digestive tract, to determine the healing rate of ulcers.

While the differences weren't statistically significant, they observed a trend! The mean healing rates were higher, and the mean decreases in ulcer size were greater with cimetidine compared to a placebo. This suggests that cimetidine, like a refreshing spring in the desert, might have a beneficial effect on ulcer healing. At the 2-week mark, 24% of the ulcers healed completely with cimetidine, compared to 14% with placebo. This difference became even more pronounced at 6 weeks, with healing rates reaching 60% in the cimetidine group and 41% in the placebo group.

The Antacid Enigma

The authors, however, cautioned that the liberal use of antacids in both groups might have obscured the true potential of cimetidine. Like sandstorms swirling in the desert, these antacids may have masked the full impact of cimetidine on ulcer healing. To get a clearer picture, they recommended future studies that either eliminate antacids entirely or use antacids with a lower neutralizing capacity.

Seeking Clarity in the Sand

This research, like a camel caravan journeying through the desert, highlights the importance of controlled studies and the potential role of cimetidine in treating gastric ulcers. The results, while not conclusive, offer a glimmer of hope for patients seeking relief from this common ailment. Further exploration in a more controlled environment, free from the interference of potent antacids, will be crucial to determine the true extent of cimetidine's healing powers.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Cimetidine might be a promising treatment for gastric ulcers, but further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness. This study serves as a reminder that even in the vast and complex desert of medicine, we must always seek clarity and control to ensure that we are truly on the right path to healing.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1978-03-29
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-30
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

340331

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

S0016508578000311

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.