Pilot study of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality-Group.

Author: BrownAustin A, GutierrezPeter M, HagmanStacy, HansonJetta, JohnsonLora, MuehlerTanner A, O'ConnorStephen, PiersonJonathan T, PodlogarMatthew C

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
INTRODUCTION: Few evidence-based options exist for outpatient treatment of patients at risk of suicide, and to-date almost all research has focused on individually delivered psychotherapy. Group therapy for veterans at risk of suicide is a promising alternative. METHODS: Thirty veterans receiving c...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12817

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

A New Group Therapy Approach for Suicide Risk in Veterans

The field of mental health, particularly concerning suicide prevention, is a vast desert with many challenges. This study delves into the world of outpatient treatment for veterans at risk of suicide, a topic that has often been a lone oasis in the vast desert of mental health research. The researchers aimed to explore a novel group therapy approach called Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality-Group (CAMS-G) as a promising alternative to traditional individual therapy. The researchers employed a randomized controlled trial, comparing veterans who received CAMS-G to those who received standard care. They found that the CAMS-G group reported higher levels of treatment satisfaction, group cohesion, and a reduction in symptoms. While both groups showed improvements in suicidal ideation and behavior, the CAMS-G participants seemed to show a slightly faster improvement. This study sheds light on the potential of group therapy in supporting veterans struggling with suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Promising Results Suggesting Potential for Broad Application

The research highlights the potential of CAMS-G as a valuable tool for helping veterans, with encouraging findings indicating a positive impact on both mental health and well-being. This research serves as a beacon in the desert of mental health challenges, suggesting that group therapy could offer a more effective approach to supporting veterans struggling with suicidal ideation and behavior. This study is a testament to the power of collaboration and collective support in addressing mental health concerns, especially in communities like veterans who may face unique challenges.

A Step Towards Better Support for Veterans

This study offers hope for veterans struggling with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The results indicate that CAMS-G could play a vital role in improving access to care and promoting well-being in this vulnerable population. The findings suggest that a group setting can provide a safe and supportive environment for veterans to connect with peers, share experiences, and learn coping skills. The benefits of such a setting are like a refreshing oasis in a desert, providing a sense of belonging and camaraderie that can be vital for recovery.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study is an important step in the right direction for addressing suicide risk in veterans. The research suggests that a group therapy approach like CAMS-G can provide a valuable service to veterans, promoting both mental health and well-being. This study is a testament to the power of collaboration and collective support in addressing mental health concerns, especially in communities like veterans who may face unique challenges.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2022-04-11
  2. Date Revised 2022-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

34780099

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/sltb.12817

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.