Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidences, causes, and risk factors of 30-day unplanned reoperation of posterior surgery for thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) based on 1948 patients in a single center. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Unplanned...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990600/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Thoracic Spinal Stenosis: A Surgical Journey Through the Desert

This research ventures into the intricate landscape of thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) surgery, exploring the incidence, causes, and risk factors of unplanned reoperations within 30 days. The authors analyzed data from 1948 patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery for TSS at a single center.

Navigating the Desert of Unplanned Reoperations

The study revealed that 3.95% of patients required unplanned reoperations within 30 days. The most common causes included epidural hematoma, wound-related complications, inadequate decompression, and implant malposition or failure. Additionally, the study identified upper thoracic spine surgery, thoracic kyphosis greater than 45 degrees, and intraoperative dural injury as independent risk factors for unplanned reoperations.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research provides valuable insights into the complexities of TSS surgery, highlighting the need for meticulous surgical techniques, careful patient selection, and comprehensive post-operative monitoring to reduce the risk of unplanned reoperations. It's a reminder that navigating this surgical desert requires a vigilant approach to ensure successful outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-03-15
  2. Date Revised 2023-10-20
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

36191058

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC9990600

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.