Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.

Author: LojanapiwatBannakij, PattanittumPorjai, PotisatSomkiat, SetthawongVasun, SrisubatAttasit

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.

Overview

Kidney stones are a common problem. This study updates a previous review to examine the best treatments for kidney stones, comparing shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) to more invasive procedures like retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). While RIRS and PCNL are newer techniques, they've become safer with improved methods and tools.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Nephrolithiasis is a common urological disease worldwide. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been used for the treatment of renal stones since the 1980s, while retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are newer, more invasive treatment modalities tha...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392035/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Treating Kidney Stones: A Comparative Analysis of Treatment Modalities

Kidney stones are a common and often painful condition, and various treatment options exist. This updated Cochrane Review compares the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treating kidney stones. The review analyzes the latest evidence on these treatment modalities, providing a comprehensive overview for healthcare professionals and patients.

Navigating the Desert of Kidney Stone Treatment

The review highlights the evolving landscape of kidney stone treatment, with RIRS and PCNL emerging as potentially more effective options than ESWL. However, it also acknowledges the importance of considering individual patient factors, including stone size and location, when choosing the most appropriate treatment modality. The review emphasizes the need for ongoing research to further refine treatment strategies for kidney stones and improve patient outcomes.

Making Informed Decisions about Kidney Stone Treatment

This Cochrane Review provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of various treatment options for kidney stones. It's like having a map guiding you through the desert of treatment options, helping you navigate the complexities and make informed decisions.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This Cochrane Review offers a comprehensive overview of the evidence on kidney stone treatment, emphasizing the need for individualized approaches and ongoing research to optimize patient outcomes. It's like discovering a hidden oasis in the vast desert of kidney stone treatment, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals and patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-08-02
  2. Date Revised 2023-10-03
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

37526261

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC10392035

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of kidney stones
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.