Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Both mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are two major strategies for the endourological management of kidney stones. In the current study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patien...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Comparative Study for Kidney Stones

This research compares the efficacy and safety of two endourological procedures, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit. The study aimed to determine which procedure offers better outcomes for this specific patient population, considering the unique challenges posed by ileal conduit. The researchers compared the success rates, complications, and recovery times associated with each procedure.

Choosing the Best Approach for Kidney Stone Treatment

The study's findings provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for kidney stone treatment in patients with ileal conduit. While both procedures demonstrated success in stone clearance, the study highlighted potential differences in complication rates and recovery times. These results provide valuable information for urologists when selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy for individual patients.

The Importance of Evidence-Based Decision Making

This research exemplifies the importance of evidence-based decision making in medicine. By comparing the outcomes of different procedures, researchers provide valuable information to guide clinical practice and enhance patient care. This approach, grounded in scientific evidence, ensures that patients receive the most effective and safe treatments possible.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research, like a caravan meticulously mapping a desert route, explores the comparative efficacy of mPNL and RIRS for kidney stone treatment in patients with ileal conduit. The findings provide valuable guidance for urologists in selecting the most appropriate procedure. Remember, just as a camel relies on its instincts to navigate a challenging terrain, we must embrace evidence-based decision making in healthcare to ensure the best possible outcomes for our patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-09-21
  2. Date Revised 2023-09-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

37728497

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.