Randomized preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for patients with carcinoma of the head and neck: preliminary report.

Author: DavisL W, GelberR D, KramerS, LowryL D, MarcialV A, SnowJ B

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Two hundred and ninety-eight patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, supraglottic larynx, hypopharynx or maxillary sinus have been randomized for preoperative radiation therapy and surgery vs. surgery and postoperative radiation therapy plus, in the case of patients wit...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.1980.90.6.930

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Head and Neck Cancer: Navigating the Desert of Treatment Options

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is a formidable foe, a challenging disease to treat. This study, like a guide through a vast desert landscape, explores the efficacy of two different treatment approaches: preoperative radiation therapy followed by surgery and surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy. Researchers, like intrepid explorers, embarked on a randomized trial, seeking to determine the most effective path for patients navigating this challenging terrain. The study's preliminary findings suggest that both treatment approaches offer similar outcomes in terms of local control and survival, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment decisions based on patient-specific factors.

A Crossroads in the Desert: Evaluating Treatment Options

This study provides valuable insights into the diverse treatment options available for head and neck cancer. The finding that both preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy approaches offer similar outcomes underscores the complexity of this disease and the need for individualized treatment planning. This information empowers clinicians to make well-informed decisions based on the unique needs of each patient.

The Desert Oasis of Personalized Treatment: Navigating Head and Neck Cancer

The desert of head and neck cancer can be a challenging landscape to navigate. This study offers valuable insights into the diverse treatment options available, emphasizing the importance of a personalized approach. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach, clinicians can work collaboratively with patients to develop a treatment plan that best addresses their individual needs.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides a valuable roadmap for clinicians navigating the complex world of head and neck cancer treatment. The finding that both preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy approaches offer similar outcomes highlights the importance of individualized treatment planning. This knowledge empowers clinicians to make well-informed decisions based on the unique needs of each patient, offering a greater chance of success in combating this formidable disease.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1980-08-15
  2. Date Revised 2019-08-25
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

7382709

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1002/lary.1980.90.6.930

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.