Comparison of insulin with or without continuation of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatment of secondary failure in NIDDM patients.

Author: ChowC C, CockramC S, SorensenJ P, TsangL W

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Optimal insulin regimens for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with secondary failure are controversial. We evaluated the efficacy, side effects, and quality of life of patients receiving insulin either alone or in combination with their previous oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.18.3.307

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Insulin Therapy for Secondary Failure in Type 2 Diabetes: Comparing Strategies

The field of [type 2 diabetes (T2D)] management is constantly seeking to optimize treatment regimens to achieve better glycemic control and minimize complications. This study investigates the effectiveness of different insulin regimens for patients with [secondary failure] of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) in T2D. The researchers compare insulin therapy alone with insulin therapy combined with continued OHA use.

Insulin Therapy for Secondary Failure: Comparing Strategies

The study found that both insulin therapy alone and insulin therapy combined with continued OHA use were effective in improving glycemic control in patients with secondary failure of OHAs in T2D. However, the study did not identify a clear advantage of one regimen over the other, suggesting that individualized treatment decisions may be necessary based on factors such as patient preference, side effect profile, and overall health status.

Personalized Approaches to T2D Management

This study underscores the importance of adopting personalized approaches to managing T2D. The researchers suggest that clinicians should carefully consider individual patient characteristics and preferences when selecting an insulin regimen. The study also emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and adjustments to ensure optimal glycemic control and minimize potential side effects.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Imagine a camel caravan facing a difficult trek through the desert, needing to adapt its strategies to overcome challenges. Just like a camel caravan, individuals with type 2 diabetes often need to adjust their treatment approaches to achieve their health goals. This study highlights the importance of tailoring insulin therapy to individual needs, ensuring that patients receive the best possible care for this complex and often challenging condition. By working together, patients and clinicians can navigate the desert of diabetes with strength and resilience.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1995-11-21
  2. Date Revised 2022-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

7555472

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2337/diacare.18.3.307

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.