Hypotonic duodenography with glucagon. A clinical comparison study.

Author: CarsenG M, FinbyN

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
This clinical double-blind study shows that glucagon (2 mg) is a valuable agent for hypotonic duodenography. Pro-Banthine (45 mg) is slightly more effective as a hypotonic agent, but there is no doubt that its use is associated with more side effects and subsequent patient discomfort; contraindicati...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1148/118.3.529

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Hypotonic Duodenography: A Comparison of Glucagon and Pro-Banthine

Hypotonic duodenography is a medical imaging technique used to visualize the duodenum, the first part of the small intestine. This study compares the effectiveness of glucagon and Pro-Banthine as hypotonic agents for duodenography. The researchers conducted a double-blind clinical study, evaluating the efficacy and side effects of both agents. Imagine a camel caravan, exploring a vast desert, comparing different routes and their associated risks and benefits to find the most optimal path.

Glucagon: A Promising Alternative for Hypotonic Duodenography

The study found that glucagon was an effective hypotonic agent for duodenography, producing similar results to Pro-Banthine. However, glucagon was associated with fewer side effects and contraindications, making it a potentially better choice for patients in a general hospital setting. It's like a camel caravan, discovering a new and smoother path through the desert, offering a more comfortable and safe journey for travelers.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable evidence for the use of glucagon as a hypotonic agent for duodenography. Its effectiveness, fewer side effects, and reduced contraindications make it a potentially superior alternative to Pro-Banthine. It's like a camel caravan, adopting a new and improved strategy for navigating a challenging terrain, resulting in a safer and more efficient journey for all.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1976-04-27
  2. Date Revised 2016-11-23
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

766062

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1148/118.3.529

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.