Pharmacokinetics and local responses to submucosal meperidine compared with other routes of administration.

Author: BurckartG, HabuckyK, McKeeK C, NazifM M, SchmittM, VenkataramananR, ZulloT

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The objective of this study was to determine the time course of the plasma levels of meperidine administered by various routes. Ten healthy adults received 0.8 mg/kg of meperidine given intravenous, submucosal, intramuscular, and 1.4 mg/kg orally in a randomized sequence at a minimum of one-week int...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8058542

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Meperidine: A Look at Different Delivery Routes

Pain management is a crucial aspect of healthcare, and choosing the right delivery route for analgesics is essential. This study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of meperidine, a commonly used opioid analgesic, when administered via intravenous, submucosal, intramuscular, and oral routes. The researchers used a randomized crossover design with ten healthy adults receiving meperidine at different doses and intervals. Blood samples were collected at various time points to determine the plasma levels of meperidine. The study found that intravenous and submucosal routes resulted in similar peak concentrations of meperidine, while intramuscular and oral routes resulted in lower peak concentrations.

Tailoring Pain Relief: Finding the Right Route

The results suggest that the choice of meperidine delivery route can significantly influence its pharmacokinetic profile. Intravenous and submucosal routes may provide faster and higher peak concentrations, potentially making them suitable for urgent pain management. However, the study also found that the submucosal route resulted in greater tissue response and pain reaction, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the potential side effects of different routes.

Navigating the Desert of Pain Relief: Choosing the Right Route

Choosing the right route for pain relief is like navigating a vast desert – each path offers its own advantages and disadvantages. Intravenous and submucosal routes may be effective for immediate pain relief, but other options might be more suitable for long-term pain management. It's important to consult with your healthcare provider to determine the best approach for your individual needs.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the pharmacokinetics of meperidine, offering a glimpse into the complexities of pain management. Like a camel navigating a desert, understanding the different routes and their effects is crucial for finding the path that leads to optimal pain relief.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1994-09-12
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

8058542

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

8058542

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.