Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of inpatient versus outpatient continence programs in the treatment of urinary incontinence in the female.

Author: AliH M, DonaldsonK, HunterM, MajorK, McKenzieS, RamsayI N, StarkD

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

In a study of 74 women with urinary incontinence, both outpatient and inpatient continence programs were effective in reducing symptoms. Outpatient programs were associated with greater improvement in leakage and overall symptoms, and were half the cost of inpatient programs. Overall, 63% of participants in each group were cured or improved enough to not require further treatment. The study concludes that outpatient conservative treatment is a successful first-line treatment for urinary incontinence in women.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Seventy-four patients presenting with a mixed pattern of urinary symptoms were randomly allocated to undergo either inpatient or outpatient continence programs as initial treatment, without prior urodynamic investigation. Both programs consisted of physiotherapy, bladder retraining, fluid normalizat...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901248

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Continence Programs for Women

This research delves into the vast and often sandy terrain of urinary incontinence in women. The study compared the effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient continence programs, using a randomized controlled trial to ensure a fair comparison. The researchers used a combination of physiotherapy, bladder retraining, and lifestyle adjustments to treat the condition. The study found that both inpatient and outpatient treatments were effective in reducing urinary incontinence symptoms, with outpatient treatment demonstrating a significant cost advantage. Outpatient treatment was found to be just as successful, if not more so, than inpatient treatment, while also being significantly cheaper.

Outpatient Treatment is a Cost-Effective Solution

The study revealed that outpatient treatment for urinary incontinence is a viable and cost-effective option. The authors found that outpatient treatment costs were half those of inpatient treatment, while achieving similar, if not better, results. This suggests that outpatient treatment could be a more sustainable and accessible option for women seeking relief from urinary incontinence.

A Desert Oasis of Relief for Women

For women navigating the challenging desert of urinary incontinence, this research provides a beacon of hope. The findings suggest that outpatient treatment can offer a cost-effective and potentially even more effective way to manage this common condition. It's like finding a refreshing oasis in the midst of a dry and challenging journey.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study is a welcome oasis in the often dry and challenging world of urinary incontinence research. By demonstrating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of outpatient treatment, the authors provide a valuable resource for healthcare providers and patients alike. It emphasizes the importance of considering all treatment options when managing this condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1997-06-23
  2. Date Revised 2019-11-11
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

9127183

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/BF01901248

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of urinary incontinence
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.