Effects of amphotericin b lipid complex injection: A Synthesis of Findings from 6 Studies
- Home
- Effects of amphotericin b lipid complex injection
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of amphotericin b lipid complex injection: A Synthesis of Findings from 6 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major Research Findings
Amphotericin B lipid complex injection (ABLC) has been developed as a less nephrotoxic alternative to conventional amphotericin B, while retaining its broad-spectrum antifungal activity. 4 . Studies have shown ABLC to be effective in treating invasive fungal infections in patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or solid organ transplantation. 4 , 3 , 2 . In BMT recipients, ABLC resulted in a positive response in 31 patients (53%), with 23 (39%) being cured and 8 (14%) showing improvement. 4 . ABLC has also been found to be less nephrotoxic compared to conventional amphotericin B. 4 . ABLC has been reported to be effective and safe in treating invasive fungal infections in children and adolescents. 2 . However, a case report has described a fatal fat embolism associated with ABLC. 6 .
Benefits and Risks
Benefits Summary
ABLC offers a less nephrotoxic approach to treating invasive fungal infections compared to conventional amphotericin B, demonstrating efficacy in various patient populations. 4 , 2 . It serves as a valuable treatment option for patients at high risk for invasive fungal infections, including those who have undergone BMT or solid organ transplantation.
Risks Summary
ABLC has been associated with a potential risk of fatal fat embolism. 6 . Careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits is necessary before using ABLC.
Comparison between Studies
Commonalities
Multiple studies have consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of ABLC in treating invasive fungal infections. 4 , 3 , 2 . These studies also concur that ABLC exhibits lower nephrotoxicity compared to conventional amphotericin B. 4 .
Differences
Direct comparison of study results is challenging due to variations in patient populations, types of infections, and treatment objectives. 4 , 3 , 6 , 2 . Notably, a fatal fat embolism associated with ABLC was reported in one study, 6 , whereas this adverse event was not observed in other studies.
Consistency and Contradictions in Results
Consistent findings across several studies underscore ABLC’s efficacy in treating invasive fungal infections. 4 , 3 , 2 . However, conflicting results exist regarding ABLC’s safety, with one study highlighting a case of fatal fat embolism. 6 . Further research is needed to clarify ABLC’s safety profile.
Considerations for Real-World Application
ABLC presents a valuable treatment option for patients at high risk for invasive fungal infections. 4 , 3 , 2 . However, it’s essential to acknowledge the potential risk of fatal fat embolism. 6 . Careful consideration and individualized evaluation are crucial when deciding to use ABLC.
Limitations of Current Research
Research on ABLC’s safety is still evolving, with further investigation required. 6 . Additional studies are needed to assess long-term safety and efficacy. Furthermore, it’s important to consider multiple factors such as underlying conditions, concurrent medications, and infection types when evaluating ABLC’s effectiveness and safety.
Future Research Directions
Long-term studies examining the safety and efficacy of ABLC are warranted. Research is needed to optimize dosing and administration strategies for ABLC. The development of new medications or treatments to mitigate the adverse effects of ABLC is also desirable.
Conclusion
ABLC stands as an effective treatment option for invasive fungal infections. 4 , 3 , 2 . However, it’s crucial to be aware of the potential for fatal fat embolism. 6 . Individualized assessment and careful consideration are essential when using ABLC. Further research is needed to fully elucidate ABLC’s safety and efficacy profile.
Article Type
Author: McCreaJacqueline B, MajumdarAnup K, GoldbergMichael R, IwamotoMarian, GarganoCynthia, PanebiancoDeborah L, HesneyMichael, LinesChristopher R, PettyKevin J, DeutschPaul J, MurphyM Gail, GottesdienerKeith M, GoldwaterD Ronald, BlumRobert A
Language : English
Author: WileyJoseph M, SeibelNita L, WalshThomas J
Language : English
Author: LindenP, WilliamsP, ChanK M
Language : English
Author: WingardJ R
Language : English
Author: AdedoyinA, BernardoJ F, SwensonC E, BolsackL E, HorwithG, DeWitS, KellyE, KlasterksyJ, SculierJ P, DeValeriolaD, AnaissieE, Lopez-BeresteinG, Llanos-CuentasA, BoyleA, BranchR A
Language : English
Author: TolentinoLucilene F, TsaiSteve F, WittMallory D, FrenchSamuel W
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.