This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effects of elivaldogene autotemcel injection: A Synthesis of Findings from 8 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of elivaldogene autotemcel injection: A Synthesis of Findings from 8 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Main Research Findings

Dronedarone has been shown to restore sinus rhythm and reduce hospitalization or death in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation. 4 Dronedarone also lowers heart rate and blood pressure and has antiadrenergic and potential ventricular antiarrhythmic effects. 4 Researchers hypothesized that dronedarone could reduce major vascular events in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation. 4 In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), dronedarone was found not to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. 7 However, observational studies showed a trend towards better survival with dronedarone compared to RCTs, particularly when looking at cardiovascular mortality. 7 A separate meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies found that dronedarone had divergent effects on endpoints like cardiovascular death or hospitalization. 5 Further research is needed to understand these discrepancies. Dronedarone has been shown to be effective in reducing atrial fibrillation burden in patients using pacemakers. 6 Dronedarone has a pharmacological profile similar to amiodarone but with a faster onset of action and a shorter half-life. 6 Despite its initial promise, concerns about safety, especially liver toxicity, have limited its use to paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and excluded it from therapy protocols for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. 8 Dronedarone, a non-iodinated benzofuran derivative, has been shown to prolong RR and QT intervals in a dose-dependent manner in healthy subjects. 1 It also showed class III and sympatholytic effects, similar to amiodarone, suggesting its potential as a unique antiarrhythmic compound. 1 In the ATHENA trial, dronedarone demonstrated both rhythm- and rate-controlling properties in patients with atrial fibrillation. 3 These effects contributed to the reduction in important clinical outcomes observed in the trial. 3 Dronedarone has also been shown to be more effective than placebo in maintaining sinus rhythm and reducing ventricular rate during recurrence of arrhythmia. 2

Benefits and Risks

Benefits Summary

Dronedarone has been shown to be effective in restoring sinus rhythm and reducing hospitalization or death in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation. 4 It also lowers heart rate and blood pressure and has antiadrenergic and potential ventricular antiarrhythmic effects. 4 Dronedarone has been shown to be effective in reducing atrial fibrillation burden in patients using pacemakers. 6

Risks Summary

Dronedarone has been found not to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. 7 However, there are concerns about its safety, including the risk of liver toxicity. 8

Comparison Between Studies

Commonalities Between Studies

Multiple studies have shown that dronedarone is effective in controlling heart rate and reducing the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients. 4 3 2 Several studies have highlighted the need for further research to understand the varied effects of dronedarone on cardiovascular death or hospitalization. 7 5 8

Differences Between Studies

Some studies suggest that dronedarone could reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, while others found no reduction in cardiovascular death or hospitalization. 4 7 Observational studies showed a trend towards better survival with dronedarone compared to RCTs, especially for cardiovascular mortality. 7

Consistency and Contradictions of Results

There are some conflicting findings regarding the safety and efficacy of dronedarone. Some studies have shown no association between dronedarone and an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. 7 8 However, other studies suggest that dronedarone may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. 4 Additionally, observational studies have shown a trend towards better survival with dronedarone compared to RCTs, especially for cardiovascular mortality. 7 More research is needed to better understand the safety and efficacy of dronedarone.

Points to Consider in Real-World Application

Dronedarone has been shown to be effective in restoring sinus rhythm and reducing hospitalization or death in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation. 4 However, it has been found not to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. 7 8 Therefore, the use of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation requires careful consideration, weighing the risks and benefits against other treatment options.

Limitations of Current Research

More research is needed to better understand the safety and efficacy of dronedarone, especially long-term effects. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the long-term impact of dronedarone.

Future Research Directions

Large-scale clinical trials are needed to further clarify the safety and efficacy of dronedarone. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the long-term impact of dronedarone. Research into methods to mitigate the risk of side effects, such as liver toxicity, is also essential.

Conclusion

Dronedarone has shown effectiveness in controlling heart rate and reducing the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients. 4 3 2 However, it has not been found to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization. 7 8 The use of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation should be carefully considered, weighing the risks and benefits against other treatment options. Further research is crucial to obtain a clearer understanding of its safety and efficacy.


Literature analysis of 8 papers
Positive Content
8
Neutral Content
0
Negative Content
0
Article Type
5
3
0
3
8

Language : English


Language : English


Author: ConnollyStuart J, CammA John, HalperinJonathan L, JoynerCampbell, AlingsMarco, AmerenaJohn, AtarDan, AvezumÁlvaro, BlomströmPer, BorggrefeMartin, BudajAndrzej, ChenShih-Ann, ChingChi Keong, CommerfordPatrick, DansAntonio, DavyJean-Marc, DelacrétazEtienne, Di PasqualeGiuseppe, DiazRafael, DorianPaul, FlakerGreg, GolitsynSergey, Gonzalez-HermosilloAntonio, GrangerChristopher B, HeidbüchelHein, KautznerJosef, KimJune Soo, LanasFernando, LewisBasil S, MerinoJose L, MorilloCarlos, MurinJan, NarasimhanCalambur, PaolassoErnesto, ParkhomenkoAlexander, PetersNicholas S, SimKui-Hian, StilesMartin K, TanomsupSupachai, ToivonenLauri, TomcsányiJános, Torp-PedersenChristian, TseHung-Fat, VardasPanos, VinereanuDragos, XavierDenis, ZhuJun, ZhuJun-Ren, Baret-CormelLydie, WeinlingEstelle, StaigerChristoph, YusufSalim, ChrolaviciusSusan, AfzalRizwan, HohnloserStefan H,


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.