Effects of estradiol transdermal patch: A Synthesis of Findings from 14 Studies
- Home
- Effects of estradiol transdermal patch
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of estradiol transdermal patch: A Synthesis of Findings from 14 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major Research Findings
Several studies have shown that estradiol transdermal patches can offer a more stable way to deliver estrogen compared to oral administration, with potential benefits for metabolism and bone health. 1 compared transdermal patches with subcutaneous pellets for estrogen delivery and found that while both methods effectively suppressed follicle-stimulating hormone, the transdermal patch led to a more fluctuating estradiol level over time compared to the subcutaneous pellets, which maintained more consistent levels. This study also showed that subcutaneous pellets were associated with faster improvements in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios compared to transdermal patches. 2 investigated the pharmacokinetics of estradiol transdermal patches with different strengths and found that the patches provided estrogen levels comparable to those observed during the early follicular phase of a woman's menstrual cycle, with a linear relationship between patch strength and estradiol levels. This study also noted that the patches were well-tolerated by participants.
5 explored the effects of estrogen administration route on bone turnover markers in athletes with oligoamenorrhea and suggested that transdermal estrogen may be more beneficial for bone health compared to oral estrogen. 4 conducted a randomized trial involving adolescent and young adult athletes with oligoamenorrhea and found that transdermal estradiol led to greater improvements in bone geometry and microarchitecture at the tibia compared to oral ethinyl estradiol after a year of treatment.
Estradiol transdermal patches have also shown effectiveness in alleviating menopausal symptoms. 10 compared a new estradiol transdermal patch with active matrix to a conventional liquid reservoir patch and found that the new patch was more effective in reducing climacteric symptoms. 1 reported that both transdermal patches and subcutaneous pellets led to the elimination of hot flushes in all participants.
Benefits and Risks
Benefit Summary
Estradiol transdermal patches offer a stable way to deliver estrogen, potentially resulting in better metabolic effects compared to oral administration. They may also be beneficial for bone health, potentially improving bone density and reducing the risk of fractures. Additionally, transdermal estradiol has been associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease compared to oral estrogen therapy. 8
Risk Summary
Estradiol transdermal patches can cause side effects such as headache, breast tenderness, and pelvic heaviness. Additionally, they may slightly increase the risk of blood clots. 3
Comparison Across Studies
Commonalities
Multiple studies consistently suggest that estradiol transdermal patches can effectively stabilize blood estrogen levels and improve menopausal symptoms.
Differences
Different studies have found variations in the effectiveness of transdermal patches compared to subcutaneous pellets or oral estrogen regarding specific metabolic effects and bone density changes. These discrepancies may be attributed to factors such as differences in study populations, patch types, and administration methods.
Consistency and Contradictions
Research findings consistently show that estradiol transdermal patches can successfully stabilize blood estrogen levels and effectively reduce menopausal symptoms. However, there are some inconsistencies in the findings regarding metabolic effects and bone density impact. These inconsistencies may be due to varying factors such as study populations, patch types, and administration methods.
Practical Application Considerations
While estradiol transdermal patches are a valuable tool for alleviating menopausal symptoms and maintaining bone health, it's important to be aware of potential side effects and risks. Consulting a physician before using these patches and choosing the appropriate type and dosage are crucial for ensuring safe and effective treatment.
Limitations of Current Research
Existing research on estradiol transdermal patches is limited in its ability to fully assess long-term impacts and variations in effectiveness across diverse populations with different ages, ethnicities, and health conditions. Further research is needed to investigate the nuanced effects of various patch types and administration methods.
Future Research Directions
Long-term studies are necessary to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of estradiol transdermal patches. Additional research is also needed to explore the effects of these patches across a broader range of populations, including women of different ages, ethnicities, and health conditions. This research should aim to determine the optimal dosage and administration methods for different individuals.
Conclusion
Estradiol transdermal patches can be an effective tool for managing menopausal symptoms and maintaining bone health. However, it's crucial to understand their potential side effects and risks. Consulting a physician is essential for choosing the right patch type, dosage, and administration method for each individual. Continued research is essential to fully understand the long-term implications and optimize the use of estradiol transdermal patches for diverse populations.
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: StanczykF Z, ShoupeD, NunezV, Macias-GonzalesP, VijodM A, LoboR A
Language : English
Author: SetnikarI, RovatiL C, ThebaultJ J, GuillaumeM, MignotA, RenouxA, GualanoV
Language : English
Author: ConnellNathan T, ConnorsJean M
Language : English
Author: AckermanKathryn E, SinghalVibha, SlatteryMeghan, EddyKamryn T, BouxseinMary L, LeeHang, KlibanskiAnne, MisraMadhusmita
Language : English
Author: SinghalVibha, AckermanKathryn E, BoseAmita, FloresLandy Paola Torre, LeeHang, MisraMadhusmita
Language : English
Author: AckermanKathryn E, SinghalVibha, BaskaranCharumathi, SlatteryMeghan, Campoverde ReyesKaren Joanie, TothAlexander, EddyKamryn T, BouxseinMary L, LeeHang, KlibanskiAnne, MisraMadhusmita
Language : English
Author: DavarRobab, JanatiSima, MohseniFereshteh, KhabazkhoobMehdi, AsgariSoheila
Language : English
Author: BertonazziAbigail, NelsonBridgette, SalvadorJamie, UmlandElena
Language : English
Author: StachenfeldN S, KeefeD L, PalterS F
Language : English
Author: RovatiL C, SchmidK, GiacovelliG, BonnM, SetnikarI, WolffF, GenazzaniA R
Language : English
Author: SetnikarI, RovatiL C, SantoroA, GuillaumeM, MignotA, RenouxA, GualanoV
Language : English
Author: StachenfeldN S, DiPietroL, PalterS F, NadelE R
Language : English
Author: SetnikarI, RovatiL C, ThebaultJ J, GuillaumeM, MignotA, RenouxA, GualanoV
Language : English
Author: StanczykF Z, ShoupeD, NunezV, Macias-GonzalesP, VijodM A, LoboR A
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.