Effective treatment of marijuana: A Synthesis of Findings from 21 Studies
- Home
- Effective treatment of marijuana
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of marijuana: A Synthesis of Findings from 21 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Key Research Findings
Multiple studies have investigated the effectiveness of various approaches to treating marijuana use. 5 found that extended cognitive-behavioral group therapy (RPSG) and brief individual therapy using motivational interviewing (IAI) significantly reduced marijuana use, dependence symptoms, and negative consequences compared to a control group. 17 assessed the time to marijuana abstinence initiation in adolescents, with 51% achieving at least 6 weeks of abstinence. 1 demonstrated the effectiveness of behavioral therapy in significantly improving drug-free rates compared to a supportive treatment. 13 explored the mechanisms of change in marijuana dependence, suggesting cognitive-behavioral coping skills training (CBT) and contingency management (ContM) as potential mechanisms. 14 highlighted the importance of treatment process and alliance in both brief and extended treatments for marijuana dependence. 3 found that pretreatment marijuana use frequency and self-efficacy were significant predictors of post-treatment marijuana use frequency. 12 investigated the effects of THC and lofexidine in a human laboratory model of marijuana withdrawal and relapse. 18 examined the association between marijuana use and abstinence from other substances among individuals with substance dependence. 19 evaluated the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on alcohol use during adolescent marijuana cessation trials. 4 investigated the impact of marijuana use on treatment outcomes among opioid-dependent patients. 15 found that contingency management (CM) was effective for cocaine-dependent patients with pretreatment marijuana use. 8 explored the potential of divalproex sodium as a pharmacotherapy for marijuana dependence. 9 demonstrated the effectiveness of abstinence-based vouchers in promoting extended marijuana abstinence and the role of cognitive-behavioral therapy in maintaining those gains. 6 established the Marijuana Treatment Project (MTP) to develop empirically validated treatments for marijuana dependence. 2 compared the effectiveness of relapse prevention (RP) and social support (SSP) group discussion interventions for marijuana dependence. 7 evaluated the effectiveness of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) with and without contingency management (CM) in engaging young marijuana abusers in treatment. 20 reviewed evidence for medical cannabinoids in children and adolescents. 11 analyzed the cost-effectiveness of using contingency management (CM) and motivational/skills-building therapy (MET/CBT) to treat young adults with marijuana dependence. 16 compared the efficacy of four pharmacotherapy agents (naltrexone, bupropion, escitalopram, and bromazepam) for marijuana addiction. 10 found that the combination of MET/CBT and CM was most effective in treating young adults with marijuana dependence.
Treatment Summary
These studies highlight various approaches to treating marijuana dependence. 5 suggests that extended cognitive-behavioral group therapy (RPSG) and brief motivational interviewing-based individual therapy (IAI) are effective. 17 indicates the potential of 14-week behavioral therapy for adolescents. 1 shows that behavioral therapy significantly improves drug-free rates compared to supportive treatments. 13 suggests that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and contingency management (ContM) may be effective mechanisms of change. 9 demonstrates the effectiveness of combining abstinence-based vouchers with cognitive-behavioral therapy for long-term abstinence maintenance. Additionally, 11 found that contingency management (CM) and motivational/skills-building therapy (MET/CBT) are cost-effective for treating young adults with marijuana dependence. 16 explores the efficacy of pharmacotherapy agents such as naltrexone, bupropion, escitalopram, and bromazepam.
Benefits and Risks
Benefit Summary
Treatment for marijuana dependence can reduce marijuana use, dependence symptoms, and negative consequences. It can also improve quality of life, increase concentration at work or school, enhance relationships, and reduce legal issues. Additionally, treatment can help lower the risk of relapse.
Risk Summary
Treatment for marijuana dependence can have potential side effects. For example, cognitive-behavioral therapy may temporarily trigger anxiety or discomfort when addressing past traumas or stressors. Contingency management can raise concerns about the possibility of increased dependence due to rewards such as vouchers. Additionally, pharmacotherapy carries the risk of side effects and interactions. It's crucial to consult with a doctor or therapist before starting treatment to understand the risks and benefits.
Comparison Between Studies
Commonalities
Many studies indicate that treatment for marijuana dependence provides numerous benefits for individuals, families, and society as a whole. Additionally, many studies suggest that treatment effectively reduces marijuana use, dependence symptoms, and negative consequences.
Differences
Variations in treatment methods, participants, study durations, and evaluation approaches across studies necessitate cautious interpretation of the results. For instance, while 5 found effectiveness for extended cognitive-behavioral group therapy (RPSG) and brief motivational interviewing-based individual therapy (IAI), 17 highlighted the potential of 14-week behavioral therapy for adolescents. Similarly, 9 emphasizes the effectiveness of combining abstinence-based vouchers with cognitive-behavioral therapy for long-term abstinence maintenance, while 11 demonstrates the cost-effectiveness of contingency management (CM) and motivational/skills-building therapy (MET/CBT) for treating young adults with marijuana dependence. These discrepancies could be explained by factors such as treatment method, participant characteristics, and social context.
Consistency and Contradictions in Results
Research consistently suggests that treatment for marijuana dependence is effective. However, some inconsistencies in results exist, potentially due to differences in study design, participant characteristics, evaluation methods, and other factors. The effectiveness of marijuana dependence treatment is influenced by various individual characteristics and social circumstances, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions.
Considerations for Applying Findings in Real Life
While treatment for marijuana dependence offers significant benefits, selecting and consistently adhering to appropriate treatment methods is crucial. Before seeking treatment, consult with a doctor or therapist to discuss your situation, needs, and choose a suitable treatment plan. Seeking support from family and friends can enhance treatment outcomes.
Limitations of Current Research
Current research exhibits some limitations. Many studies rely on relatively small sample sizes, limiting the generalizability of findings. Additionally, differences in treatment methods, participant characteristics, and evaluation approaches across studies complicate result comparison. Furthermore, the effectiveness of marijuana dependence treatment is influenced by numerous individual characteristics and social circumstances, making definitive conclusions difficult.
Future Research Directions
Further research on marijuana dependence treatment is necessary. Investigating long-term effects of various treatments, combined treatment effectiveness, the impact of individual characteristics and social situations on treatment outcomes, and cost-effectiveness are crucial. Research on marijuana dependence prevention is also needed.
Conclusion
Treatment for marijuana dependence shows promise for effectiveness. However, factors such as treatment method, participant characteristics, and social circumstances can influence treatment outcomes. Consult with a doctor or therapist to select a suitable treatment plan tailored to your specific needs. Family and friends' support can significantly enhance treatment success.
Treatment List
• Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)• Contingency Management (ContM)• Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET)• Abstinence-Based Vouchers• Pharmacotherapy (Naltrexone, Bupropion, Escitalopram, Bromazepam, etc.)• Group Therapy• Individual Therapy
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: AzrinN H, McMahonP T, DonohueB, BesalelV A, LapinskiK J, KoganE S, AciernoR E, GallowayE
Language : English
Author: StephensR S, RoffmanR A, SimpsonE E
Language : English
Author: StephensR S, WertzJ S, RoffmanR A
Language : English
Author: BudneyA J, BickelW K, AmassL
Language : English
Author: StephensR S, RoffmanR A, CurtinL
Language : English
Author: StephensRobert S, BaborThomas F, KaddenRonald, MillerMichael,
Language : English
Author: SinhaRajita, EastonCaroline, Renee-AubinLisa, CarrollKathleen M
Language : English
Author: LevinFrances Rudnick, McDowellDavid, EvansSuzette M, NunesEdward, AkereleEvaristo, DonovanStephen, VosburgSuzanne K
Language : English
Author: BudneyAlan J, MooreBrent A, RochaHeath L, HigginsStephen T
Language : English
Author: CarrollKathleen M, EastonCaroline J, NichCharla, HunkeleKaren A, NeavinsTara M, SinhaRajita, FordHaley L, VitoloSally A, DoebrickCheryl A, RounsavilleBruce J
Language : English
Author: OlmsteadTodd A, SindelarJody L, EastonCaroline J, CarrollKathleen M
Language : English
Author: HaneyMargaret, HartCarl L, VosburgSuzanne K, ComerSandra D, ReedStephanie Collins, FoltinRichard W
Language : English
Author: LittMark D, KaddenRonald M, Kabela-CormierElise, PetryNancy M
Language : English
Author: GibbonsCarly J, NichCharla, SteinbergKaren, RoffmanRoger A, CorvinoJoanne, BaborThomas F, CarrollKathleen M
Language : English
Author: AlessiSheila M, RashCarla, PetryNancy M
Language : English
Author: ShoenfeldNetta, BodnikDana, RosenbergOded, KotlerMoshe, DannonPinhas
Language : Hebrew
Author: BrownPamela C, BudneyAlan J, ThostensonJeff D, StangerCatherine
Language : English
Author: MojarradMohammadali, SametJeffrey H, ChengDebbie M, WinterMichael R, SaitzRichard
Language : English
Author: SquegliaLindsay M, BakerNathaniel L, McClureErin A, TomkoRachel L, AdisetiyoVitria, GrayKevin M
Language : English
Author: WongShane Shucheng, WilensTimothy E
Language : English
Author: MontgomeryLaTrice, SchiavonSamantha, CropseyKaren
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.