This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of stroke rehabilitation: A Synthesis of Findings from 27 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of stroke rehabilitation: A Synthesis of Findings from 27 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Research on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation has examined a variety of therapeutic approaches. 2 demonstrated that a higher proportion of elderly stroke patients admitted to a stroke unit were assessed as independent in self-care compared to patients with similar neurological impairment treated in medical units. This may be attributed to the earlier introduction of rehabilitation in the stroke unit than in the medical unit. 19 suggests that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with stroke severity and poorer functional outcomes, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may improve functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation. A review on interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke synthesizes evidence on the effects of individual treatment techniques and modalities. 8 . However, a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews in this area is currently lacking.

A paper focusing on top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment in stroke rehabilitation proposes the bimodal balance-recovery model (interhemispheric competition model and vicariation model) as the mechanism of functional recovery after stroke. 10 . This paper analyzes how combinations of motor observation treatment approaches, transcranial electrical (TES) or magnetic (TMS) stimulation, and peripheral electrical (PES) or magnetic (PMS) stimulation techniques can be used as accessorial physical therapy methods for symptom reduction in stroke patients. Top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment could synergistically develop into valuable physical therapy strategies in neurorehabilitation after stroke. The study explores how TES or TMS intervention over the contralesional hemisphere or the lesioned hemisphere combined with PES or PMS of the paretic limbs during motor observation followed by action execution have super-additive effects to potentiate the effect of conventional treatment in stroke patients. This proposed paradigm could be an innovative and adjunctive approach to potentiate the effect of conventional rehabilitation treatment, especially for those patients with severe motor deficits.

An observational study on the assessment and treatment of dysphagia during inpatient stroke rehabilitation highlights that oropharyngeal dysphagia, a common swallowing impairment post-stroke, is managed by speech-language pathologists (SLP). 11 . This article demonstrates a local “know-do” gap assessment for usual dysphagia care for patients undergoing inpatient stroke rehabilitation in primary healthcare in Norway. This assessment includes an evaluation of the functional level of the patients and the characteristics and outcomes of treatment. This study suggests a gap in the assessment and treatment of dysphagia in stroke rehabilitation.

treatmentまとめ

Treatment in stroke rehabilitation includes physical therapy, occupational therapy, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), action observation treatment combined with transcranial electrical (TES) or magnetic (TMS) stimulation and peripheral electrical (PES) or magnetic (PMS) stimulation techniques, neurodevelopmental treatment, brain-computer interfaces (BCI), etc.

Benefits and Risks

Benefits Summary

Benefits of treatment in stroke rehabilitation include:

  • Improved self-care independence
  • Functional recovery
  • Improved motor skills
  • Cognitive improvement
  • Improved quality of life

Risks Summary

Risks of treatment in stroke rehabilitation include:

  • Side effects
  • Financial burden
  • Time commitment

Comparison Between Studies

Commonalities

Research on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation suggests that early rehabilitation plays a crucial role in functional recovery across many studies. Furthermore, there is a common understanding that individualized treatment tailored to the specific needs of each patient is essential.

Differences

Differences between studies include the therapeutic approach, the target patient population, and the assessment methods used. For instance, some studies examine the effectiveness of physical therapy while others focus on occupational therapy. Additionally, the target patient population may vary between studies, including patients in the acute, subacute, or chronic phases of stroke.

Consistency and Contradictions in Results

While some studies on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation have yielded consistent results, others have shown contradictory findings. This may be attributed to differences in research methods, target patient populations, and assessment methods. Future research should prioritize using more standardized research methodologies.

Considerations for Real-World Application

When applying findings from research on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation to real-world settings, the following considerations are crucial:

  • Patients’ conditions and needs vary, so treatment plans should be customized for each individual.
  • Treatment requires time and financial resources, making patient motivation and family support indispensable.
  • Treatment outcomes can vary between patients, and not all patients will experience the desired results.

Limitations of Current Research

Research on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation still faces several challenges. For example, there is a shortage of long-term outcome studies, highlighting the need for larger-scale research. Additionally, research on individual differences in treatment outcomes is insufficient, necessitating more in-depth analysis.

Future Research Directions

Future research on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation should prioritize the following:

  • Long-term outcome studies
  • Studies on individual differences in treatment outcomes
  • Development of new therapeutic approaches

Conclusion

Research on the effectiveness of treatment in stroke rehabilitation has rapidly advanced in recent years, leading to the development of various therapeutic approaches. Based on these findings, selecting the optimal treatment plan tailored to each patient’s needs is crucial. Rehabilitation following stroke holds significant potential for improving patients’ quality of life. With active involvement from patients themselves, their families, and healthcare professionals, we can expect even better results.

Treatment List

Physical therapy, occupational therapy, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), action observation treatment combined with transcranial electrical (TES) or magnetic (TMS) stimulation and peripheral electrical (PES) or magnetic (PMS) stimulation techniques, neurodevelopmental treatment, brain-computer interfaces (BCI), mirror therapy, intervention-based exercise training, neurofeedback, functional electrical stimulation (FES), robotic therapy, hand exoskeleton training, etc.


Literature analysis of 27 papers
Positive Content
26
Neutral Content
1
Negative Content
0
Article Type
9
1
2
6
27

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.