The treatment of chronic cancer pain in a cancer hospital in The Netherlands.

Author: Abu-SaadH H, MatternC, Vielvoye-KerkmeerA, de WitR, van DamF

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
In a prospective study of 313 Dutch cancer patients with chronic pain, the practice of pain treatment was evaluated by means of Donabedian's structure-process-outcome framework. The practice of pain treatment was assessed by: (1) structural resources, describing the setting in which pain treatment i...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00150-x

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Addressing Chronic Cancer Pain: A Multifaceted Approach

Chronic cancer pain is a significant challenge for many individuals undergoing cancer treatment. This study examines the practice of pain management in a cancer hospital in the Netherlands, evaluating the effectiveness of pain treatment strategies and identifying areas for improvement. The researchers employed a comprehensive approach, utilizing Donabedian's structure-process-outcome framework to assess pain management practices, considering structural resources, clinical processes, and patient outcomes.

The Importance of Comprehensive Pain Management

The study found that a significant proportion of cancer pain patients received less than optimal pain treatment, highlighting the need for improvements in both structural resources and clinical processes. The researchers identified gaps in pain education and communication, underscoring the importance of ongoing training for healthcare providers and a more proactive approach to pain management.

Improving the Quality of Cancer Pain Treatment

This research serves as a call for action to improve the quality of cancer pain treatment. It emphasizes the need for increased resources, enhanced training for healthcare providers, and improved communication strategies to ensure that all cancer patients receive optimal pain management. The study underscores the importance of a patient-centered approach, considering individual needs and preferences in pain management strategies.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research is like a caravan seeking a healing oasis in the desert of cancer pain. The study highlights the importance of a comprehensive and patient-centered approach to pain management, emphasizing the need for continued efforts to improve care and ensure that all individuals suffering from cancer pain receive appropriate treatment and support. Remember, just as a camel relies on its inherent strength and resilience to endure the desert, cancer patients need our compassion, expertise, and dedication to help them navigate this challenging journey.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1999-06-17
  2. Date Revised 2019-09-15
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

10355212

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00150-x

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.