Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Management of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus surgical evacuation.

Author: AnkumWillem M, BindelsPatrick J E, BonselGouke J, VosJeroen, Wieringa-de WaardMargreet

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

This study highlights the need for more randomized clinical trials to determine the best treatment for women experiencing a miscarriage, considering individual preferences for surgical uterine evacuation or expectant management.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
In many countries, surgical uterine evacuation is the standard treatment for women with a miscarriage, but expectant management has been advocated as an alternative. The choice between the two options cannot be based on published evidence alone, because randomized clinical trials are scarce while ge...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.9.2445

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Desert of Miscarriage: Expectant Management vs. Surgical Evacuation

Miscarriage, like a storm in the desert, can be a devastating experience. This study, like a guide navigating the complex terrain of miscarriage management, examines the effectiveness of expectant management versus surgical evacuation as treatment options. The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the two approaches, seeking to provide evidence-based guidance for healthcare providers and patients. The study found that while surgical evacuation is the standard treatment in many countries, expectant management might be a viable alternative, offering a more natural and potentially less invasive approach.

Expectant Management: A Viable Oasis in the Desert of Miscarriage

The study's findings suggest that expectant management can be a safe and effective alternative to surgical evacuation for miscarriage. The researchers emphasize the importance of individual preferences in choosing the most suitable management approach and highlight the need for further research to explore the optimal use of expectant management in various clinical scenarios.

Navigating the Desert of Miscarriage Management

This research offers valuable insights into the complex desert of miscarriage management. It emphasizes the importance of individualized care and the need for evidence-based decision-making. The study's findings suggest that expectant management could provide a viable alternative to surgical evacuation for many patients, offering a more natural and potentially less invasive approach.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

The desert of miscarriage management requires careful navigation. This study reveals expectant management as a potential oasis, offering a safe and effective alternative to surgical evacuation. The research highlights the importance of considering individual preferences and exploring all available treatment options to find the best path for healing and recovery.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2003-03-14
  2. Date Revised 2019-05-13
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

12202439

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1093/humrep/17.9.2445

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of miscarriage
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.