Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Author: BertelsmannFrits W, BouterLex M, GerritsenAnnette A M, ScholtenRob J P M, de KromMarc C T F M, de VetHenrica C W

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Open carpal tunnel release surgery resulted in better outcomes than treatment with wrist splinting for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
CONTEXT: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated with nonsurgical or surgical options. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of splinting and surgery for relieving the symptoms of CTS. DESIGN, SETTI...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.10.1245

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Splinting vs. Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Trial

This study investigates the effectiveness of splinting versus surgery for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the short-term and long-term outcomes of these two treatment approaches. They found that surgery was more effective than splinting in relieving CTS symptoms, with higher success rates and greater improvements in general improvement, sleep quality, and symptom severity. This suggests that surgery may be a more effective treatment option for CTS.

Beyond the Sand: Choosing the Right Path for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different treatment options for CTS. The findings suggest that surgery may be a more effective treatment option than splinting, leading to greater symptom relief and long-term improvement. This research highlights the importance of considering individual patient needs and preferences when choosing the most appropriate treatment approach for CTS.

A Journey to Relief: Managing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition that can significantly impact daily life. This research helps guide clinical decision-making for managing CTS, offering evidence-based insights into the effectiveness of different treatment options. By considering the individual patient's needs and preferences, healthcare professionals can help patients navigate their journey towards symptom relief and improved quality of life.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study offers valuable guidance for managing carpal tunnel syndrome. The research demonstrates that surgery may be a more effective treatment option than splinting, leading to greater symptom relief and long-term improvement. This research emphasizes the importance of considering individual patient needs and preferences when making informed decisions about treatment for this common condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2002-09-23
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

12215131

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1001/jama.288.10.1245

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.