The efficacy of combined zidovudine and lamivudine compared with that of combined zidovudine, lamivudine and nelfinavir in asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children.

Author: LikanonsakulSirirat, MoolasartPikul

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
In this 6-month prospective study, we compared the efficacy of two treatment regimens: double-drug therapy with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) and triple-drug therapy with ZDV plus 3TC plus nelfinavir (NFV), in the treatment of asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children. Twenty-...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12236426

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

HIV Treatment in Children: Comparing Double and Triple-Drug Therapies

This study examines the efficacy of different treatment regimens for HIV-infected children. The authors compare the outcomes of double-drug therapy (zidovudine and lamivudine) with triple-drug therapy (zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir) in asymptomatic and early symptomatic children. They assess the impact of each regimen on key clinical parameters, including weight, CD4 cell count, viral load, and side effects. Their findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of these treatment options for HIV-infected children.

Double vs. Triple-Drug Therapies: No Significant Difference in Efficacy

This study demonstrates that both double-drug and triple-drug therapies are well-tolerated and effective in managing HIV infection in children. While triple-drug therapy showed a trend towards better outcomes in terms of weight gain, CD4 cell count increase, and viral load reduction, the differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that both regimens are viable options for treating HIV in children, with potential benefits and risks to be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Tailoring Treatment to Individual Needs

This research emphasizes the importance of tailoring HIV treatment to the specific needs of each child. While both double-drug and triple-drug therapies demonstrated effectiveness, the choice of regimen should be guided by individual factors such as disease stage, tolerance, and potential side effects. This highlights the need for individualized care plans and close monitoring to optimize HIV treatment in children.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Like the shifting sands of the desert, HIV treatment strategies continue to evolve. This study sheds light on the effectiveness of different treatment regimens for HIV-infected children, emphasizing the importance of personalized care and ongoing research to optimize treatment outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2003-01-27
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

12236426

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

12236426

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.