Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A systematic review of randomized trials in localized prostate cancer.

Author: AlibhaiShabbir M H, KlotzLaurence H

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Most studies on localized prostate cancer are observational, not controlled trials. A recent large randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy (RP) to watchful waiting (WW) has increased focus on treating localized prostate cancer. This review analyzed all published randomized trials that compared different initial treatment approaches for localized prostate cancer.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Most treatment studies of localized prostate cancer are observational in nature. The recent publication of a large randomized trial of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus watchful waiting (WW) has focused increased attention on the treatment of localized prostate cancer. We reviewed all published rand...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15003149

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Randomized Trials in Localized Prostate Cancer: Evaluating Treatment Options

The field of oncology is constantly seeking better ways to treat cancer. This study reviews the existing evidence from randomized trials comparing different treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The researchers aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the research literature on this important topic.

Randomized Trials: A Crucial Tool for Evaluating Cancer Treatments

The study emphasizes the importance of randomized trials in evaluating cancer treatments. These trials allow researchers to compare the effectiveness of different treatment approaches in a controlled and rigorous manner. The study highlights the ongoing need for high-quality research to inform best practice guidelines for treating prostate cancer.

Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Treatment

This research provides valuable information for patients and their healthcare providers when making decisions about prostate cancer treatment. By understanding the results of randomized trials, individuals can make more informed choices about the most appropriate treatment options. It's like choosing the right caravan route through the desert – the best path depends on the specific needs and goals of the traveler.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research underscores the importance of evidence-based decision-making in cancer treatment. It's like a camel caravan navigating a vast and unknown desert – by relying on proven strategies and careful planning, we can increase our chances of success and find the best path forward. The results of randomized trials serve as a vital guide in the journey toward effective cancer therapies.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2004-06-01
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-30
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

15003149

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

15003149

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of prostate cancer
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.