Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

How effective are cognitive and behavioral treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder? A clinical significance analysis.

Author: FisherPeter L, WellsAdrian

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.

Overview

This study compared the effectiveness of different psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) using standardized methods to define improvement. The study found that exposure and response prevention (ERP) appears to be the most effective treatment, with 50-60% of patients achieving symptom-free status. However, when considering only complete symptom resolution (no symptoms), ERP and cognitive therapy had similar and lower rates of success (around 25%). The study emphasizes the importance of using consistent methods to evaluate the effectiveness of OCD treatments.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Controlled outcome studies investigating the efficacy of psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have employed different methods of determining the clinical significance of treatment effects. This makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding the absolute and relative eff...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.007

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

How Effective are Cognitive and Behavioral Treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder? A Clinical Significance Analysis

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a relentless and often debilitating condition characterized by intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors, presents a unique challenge in the realm of mental health. This study, a clinical significance analysis, explores the effectiveness of psychological treatments for OCD, investigating their impact on symptom reduction and the likelihood of achieving lasting recovery. The researchers meticulously examined the outcomes of recent psychological trials for OCD, seeking to determine the most effective treatment approaches for this complex disorder.

Effective Treatments for OCD: A Beacon of Hope

The study's findings reveal a clear advantage for exposure and response prevention (ERP) as the most effective treatment currently available, with a significant proportion of patients achieving symptom remission. While cognitive therapy also showed promise, its effectiveness was lower than ERP. These findings provide valuable insights into the relative efficacy of different psychological treatment approaches for OCD, offering a glimmer of hope for individuals seeking relief from this challenging disorder.

A Path to Recovery from OCD

The desert of OCD can be a daunting and isolating place, but this study offers a beacon of hope, highlighting the effectiveness of psychological treatment approaches, particularly ERP. By understanding the unique benefits of different treatment modalities, we can empower individuals with OCD to embark on a path towards recovery and experience a newfound sense of freedom from their symptoms. Think of these treatments as a compass, guiding us towards a brighter future for those living with OCD.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides a valuable framework for evaluating the effectiveness of psychological treatments for OCD. The findings highlight the efficacy of ERP, offering a beacon of hope for individuals seeking relief from this challenging disorder. Think of this research as a map, guiding us towards a more comprehensive and effective approach to managing OCD.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2006-05-25
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16239151

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.007

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.