Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Pain and return to daily activities after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial.

Author: AnkumWillem M, BirnieErwin, HehenkampWouter J K, ReekersJim A, VolkersNicole A

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Pain was significantly less after UAE during hospital stay. Return to several daily activities was in favor of UAE in comparison with hysterectomy.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) and hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids by means of a randomized controlled trial. The present paper analyses short-term outcomes, i.e., pain and return to daily activities. METHODS: Patients were randomized...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0195-9

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Two Treatments for Uterine Fibroids: A Tale of Two Sands

The field of [gynecology] is always seeking new ways to treat [symptomatic uterine fibroids]. This study dives into the [safety and efficacy] of two common treatments: [uterine artery embolization (UAE)] and [hysterectomy]. The researchers used a [randomized controlled trial] to compare the [short-term outcomes] of these treatments, specifically focusing on [pain and return to daily activities]. They found that [UAE patients experienced significantly less pain during the first 24 hours after treatment]. This suggests that [UAE might be a less painful option] for some patients. Furthermore, [UAE patients returned to their daily activities significantly sooner than hysterectomy patients].

UAE: A Speedy Recovery for Many

These findings highlight the potential benefits of [UAE] in terms of [pain management and faster recovery]. The study's results suggest that [UAE could be a more desirable option] for patients who value [a quicker return to their daily lives] and [minimal discomfort].

Navigating the Sands of Recovery: Considerations for Patients

While [UAE] appears to offer [potential benefits] in terms of [pain and recovery], it's crucial to consider the [individual patient's needs and circumstances]. Some patients may have [specific medical conditions] that make [hysterectomy] a better option. It's always wise to [consult with your doctor] to determine the [best treatment] for your unique situation.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study is like a camel caravan navigating the desert. We see two routes: [UAE] is a faster, more comfortable journey, but not always the right path. [Hysterectomy] may be a longer, bumpier ride, but it could be the best option for some destinations. As always, consult with your doctor to find the right path for your needs. After all, every camel caravan has its own unique journey.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2006-06-23
  2. Date Revised 2015-11-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16447002

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/s00270-005-0195-9

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of uterine fibroids
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.