Effects of levocetirizine as add-on therapy to fluticasone in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Author: BarnesM L, FardonT C, LipworthB J, WardJ H

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Addition of H(1) antagonists to intranasal corticosteroid treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) is common in clinical practice and recommended by guidelines, despite some evidence that the additive benefits are negligible. OBJECTIVE: To assess additional benefits of 5 mg levocetirizine di...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02478.x

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Beyond Nasal Steroids: Evaluating the Benefits of Adding Levocetirizine for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a common ailment affecting millions worldwide. While intranasal corticosteroids are often considered the mainstay of treatment, many clinicians also prescribe antihistamines as add-on therapy. However, this practice has been questioned due to the lack of robust evidence supporting its efficacy. This study aimed to assess the additional benefits of levocetirizine, an H1-antihistamine, when added to fluticasone propionate nasal spray, a common nasal steroid, in patients with SAR. The results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study showed that levocetirizine did not provide any clinically significant benefits when added to effective nasal steroid treatment for SAR.

Navigating the Sands of Allergy Treatment: Levocetirizine and Nasal Steroids

The study found that levocetirizine did not provide any clinically significant benefits when added to effective nasal steroid treatment for SAR. This finding challenges the common practice of using antihistamines as an add-on therapy for SAR, suggesting that it may be unnecessary in many cases. The results highlight the need for a more evidence-based approach to managing SAR.

The Importance of Evidence-Based Practices in Allergy Management

This study underscores the importance of relying on evidence-based practices in allergy management. Like a desert traveler carefully choosing their route, we must ensure that our treatment decisions are guided by robust scientific evidence. This study calls for a reevaluation of the role of antihistamines as add-on therapy for SAR.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of antihistamines as add-on therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis. The findings suggest that, like a mirage in the desert, the perceived benefits of antihistamines may not be as substantial as previously thought. It highlights the importance of relying on evidence-based practices to guide our treatment choices.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2006-10-27
  2. Date Revised 2015-11-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16650054

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02478.x

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.