Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Primary surgery for ovarian cancer.

Author: KaernJ, TropéC

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Optimal surgical staging for early-stage ovarian cancer and management for high-risk patients are still debated. Large retrospective studies consistently show residual disease size after cytoreductive surgery as a significant prognostic factor, but the size threshold for survival benefit remains undefined. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer is unclear, prompting a large prospective randomized study.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
AIM: Review studies on survival outcomes for all survival treatment methods of primary ovarian cancer. METHODS: This presentation is based on systematic literature search in Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane and Internet addresses for treatment protocols. RESULTS: Major controversies still exist on what c...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.036

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Primary Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: A Critical Review

The treatment of [ovarian cancer] presents complex challenges, particularly in determining the optimal surgical approach for different stages of the disease. This review delves into the current controversies surrounding [surgical staging] for [early-stage ovarian cancer] and [surgical management] for [high-risk patients]. The authors analyzed numerous studies to identify key factors influencing prognosis, such as the size of [residual disease] after surgery and the role of [neoadjuvant chemotherapy]. The review concludes that more research is needed to establish clear guidelines for optimal surgical treatment strategies for [ovarian cancer].

Optimal Surgical Management: A Constant Pursuit in Ovarian Cancer

This research underscores the ongoing need for more robust evidence to guide [surgical management] of [ovarian cancer]. The study's findings highlight the importance of [residual disease] size after surgery and the uncertainty surrounding the role of [neoadjuvant chemotherapy]. These areas require further investigation to improve patient outcomes and develop more effective treatment strategies.

Navigating the Journey of Ovarian Cancer: Seeking the Right Path

The treatment of [ovarian cancer] can be like navigating a vast and complex desert. This research provides valuable insights into the current landscape of [surgical management] and highlights the need for continued exploration to find more effective and personalized treatment strategies. Remember, seeking professional guidance and participating in clinical trials can play a vital role in advancing our understanding of this disease and improving patient outcomes.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This review serves as a compass, guiding us through the complexities of [ovarian cancer] treatment. The authors meticulously examined the existing evidence, revealing the need for more research to pinpoint the optimal surgical approach for different stages of the disease. By continuing to explore the intricacies of this disease, we can pave the way for more effective and compassionate care for those facing this challenging diagnosis.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2006-11-21
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16677797

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.036

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.