Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Cognitive therapy with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a comparative evaluation.

Author: BeensH, EmmelkampP M

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) and exposure in vivo were both effective in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder, with similar outcomes.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
After a 4-week waiting period 21 obsessive-compulsives were randomly allocated to two treatment conditions (1) Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) and (2) exposure in vivo. RET consisted of analysing irrational thoughts; exposure in vivo was self-controlled. After six sessions and another 4-week waiting ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(91)90120-r

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Cognitive Therapy with Exposure Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

This study delves into the fascinating world of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), exploring the effectiveness of two popular therapeutic approaches: Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) and exposure in vivo. This research journey, like a camel traversing the vast desert, seeks to uncover the best path for individuals struggling with OCD. Utilizing a randomized controlled trial, the researchers meticulously compared the outcomes of these two therapies. Their findings revealed that both RET and exposure in vivo resulted in significant improvements in anxiety, discomfort, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. However, the study found no statistically significant differences between the two treatments, implying that both could be effective options for those seeking relief from OCD.

A Desert of Doubt: Exploring the Effectiveness of Therapy

The study demonstrated that both RET and exposure in vivo led to significant improvements in anxiety, discomfort, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. This finding is significant as it highlights the potential of both therapies to alleviate the burden of OCD, a condition that can be quite distressing and disruptive to daily life.

The Oasis of Relief: Choosing the Right Path

Individuals struggling with OCD might find solace in knowing that both RET and exposure in vivo have been shown to be effective treatment options. However, it is crucial to consult with a qualified mental health professional to determine which therapy is best suited to their specific needs and preferences. Like a camel choosing the best oasis to quench its thirst, finding the right therapy can be a key step towards managing OCD.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research sheds light on the effectiveness of RET and exposure in vivo for OCD, providing individuals and clinicians with valuable insights into treatment options. The study's findings, much like a desert map guiding a camel on its journey, can help navigate the complex landscape of OCD treatment and guide individuals towards a path of recovery. It is important to note, however, that the study did not delve into the specific mechanisms underlying these treatments, leaving room for further research to unravel the nuances of these therapeutic approaches.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1991-10-01
  2. Date Revised 2019-08-27
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

1679324

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/0005-7967(91)90120-r

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.