Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized clinical and electrophysiological study.

Author: DasChandi P, KhuranaDheeraj, LalVivek, MishraSanjay, ModiManish, PrabhakarSudesh

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Splinting and oral steroids were both effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), with significant improvement in symptom severity score, functional status score, and median nerve sensory and motor distal latency and conduction velocity. The steroid group showed a greater improvement in functional status score than the splint group.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical and electrophysiological study with 3-month follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with CTS were randomly divided into ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.27155

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Splinting vs. Steroids: Navigating the Desert of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a common condition affecting the hand and wrist, is like a desert mirage, causing pain and discomfort that can disrupt daily life. This research investigates the efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in treating CTS. Researchers conducted a randomized clinical trial with 40 patients. They found that both splinting and oral steroids significantly improved symptoms and electrophysiological measures at 3 months, though steroids provided a slightly greater improvement in functional status. The study suggests that both approaches are effective, but patients and doctors should consider the individual needs and preferences when making treatment decisions.

Splinting and Steroids: Two Oasis in the Desert of CTS

This research highlights the effectiveness of both splinting and oral steroids in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Both approaches provide significant relief from symptoms, but steroids may offer slightly better functional improvement. This study provides valuable insights for patients and doctors seeking the most effective treatment option for CTS. It's like finding two different oasis in the desert, each offering a different path to relief from CTS symptoms.

Finding Relief in the Desert of CTS

Carpal tunnel syndrome can be a debilitating condition, but this research offers hope for finding relief. By comparing the effectiveness of splinting and oral steroids, the study provides valuable information for patients and doctors to make informed decisions about treatment. It's like having two options for navigating the desert of CTS, leading to a more comfortable and functional outcome for patients.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research demonstrates the effectiveness of both splinting and oral steroids in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. The study provides valuable insights for patients and doctors to make informed decisions about treatment options based on individual needs and preferences. It's like having two different paths through the desert of CTS, both leading to a more comfortable and functional outcome for patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2006-10-24
  2. Date Revised 2019-11-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16936391

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.4103/0028-3886.27155

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.