Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.
Author: BastianPatrick J, BjartellAnders, CarterBallentine H, MontorsiFrancesco, SchröderFritz, SeitzMichael, StanislausPeter, StiefChristian G
Original Abstract of the Article :
CONTEXT: Due to early detection strategies, prostate cancer is diagnosed early in its natural history. It remains unclear whether all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer warrant radical treatment or may benefit from delayed intervention following active surveillance. OBJECTIVE: A systematic rev...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.028
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
The Crossroads of Prostate Cancer: Active Surveillance vs. Immediate Treatment
The diagnosis of prostate cancer can be a daunting experience, like navigating a winding path through a vast desert. This research delves into the question of whether all men diagnosed with prostate cancer require immediate treatment or if some might benefit from a more watchful approach known as active surveillance. The authors conducted a comprehensive review of active surveillance protocols, examining the criteria used to select patients for this approach and the outcomes of treatment. Their findings suggest that the inclusion criteria for active surveillance are remarkably similar across various studies. They emphasize the need for careful evaluation and monitoring to determine the optimal treatment path for each individual.Active Surveillance: A New Path in the Desert of Prostate Cancer
The study emphasizes that active surveillance is a viable alternative to immediate treatment for men diagnosed with insignificant prostate cancer. It suggests that the criteria used to identify low-risk prostate cancer are consistent, and that immediate treatment for these patients might lead to unnecessary intervention. While the authors acknowledge the limitations of current data, they advocate for further research through randomized trials to gain a deeper understanding of the long-term outcomes of active surveillance.Navigating the Desert of Prostate Cancer Treatment: A New Oasis of Hope
Active surveillance offers a new oasis of hope for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer, providing an alternative to immediate treatment. The research highlights the need for personalized care and a thorough understanding of individual risk factors to guide treatment decisions. It also underscores the importance of ongoing research to further refine active surveillance protocols and provide men with the most effective and tailored treatment options.Dr. Camel's Conclusion
The desert of prostate cancer treatment is vast and complex. Active surveillance offers a new path for men with insignificant prostate cancer, allowing them to avoid unnecessary treatment. However, we must continue to explore this terrain with rigorous research and careful monitoring to ensure optimal outcomes for all.Date :
- Date Completed 2009-11-03
- Date Revised 2022-04-09
Further Info :
Related Literature
Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages
English
Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.