Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study.

Author: AidaYoshiyuki, HibiToshifumi, IidaMitsuo, ItoHiroaki, MatsumotoTakayuki, SuzukiYasuo, TakanoYuichi, YoshidaToyomitsu

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Mesalamine has been used as the first-line medication for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two different mesalamine formulations in the maintenance of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomi...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972641/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Mesalamine Formulations for Ulcerative Colitis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that can cause significant discomfort and impact quality of life. Mesalamine, a drug that reduces inflammation in the gut, is often used to treat UC. This study compares the effectiveness and safety of two different mesalamine formulations, a pH-dependent release formulation and a time-dependent release formulation, in maintaining remission in patients with UC. The researchers conducted a double-blind, randomized study involving 131 patients with quiescent UC, randomly assigning them to receive one of the two formulations for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without bloody stools.

Similar Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine Formulations

The study found that both mesalamine formulations were equally effective in maintaining remission in patients with UC. The proportion of patients without bloody stools was similar in both groups, demonstrating the noninferiority of the pH-dependent release formulation to the time-dependent release formulation. Furthermore, the study found no significant difference in the safety profiles of the two formulations. These findings suggest that both formulations are viable options for managing UC, allowing patients to choose the formulation that best meets their individual needs and preferences.

Managing Ulcerative Colitis: Treatment Options and Patient Choice

This study provides valuable insights for clinicians managing patients with UC, demonstrating that both pH-dependent and time-dependent release mesalamine formulations are effective and safe. These findings empower patients with UC to discuss their treatment options with their healthcare providers and choose the formulation that best aligns with their individual needs and preferences. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of ongoing research to develop even more effective and targeted treatments for UC, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a shimmering oasis in the vast desert of inflammatory bowel disease research, provides valuable insights into the management of ulcerative colitis. It demonstrates that both pH-dependent and time-dependent release mesalamine formulations offer effective and safe treatment options, empowering patients to choose the approach that best suits their needs. This research serves as a testament to the ongoing advancements in the field of inflammatory bowel disease treatment, offering hope for patients seeking relief from this challenging condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2010-12-16
  2. Date Revised 2021-10-20
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

20049949

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC2972641

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.