Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

[Comparison of antianginal effects of diltiazem and metoprolol in patients with ischemic heart disease with different clinical forms of angina pectoris].

Author: GulievA B, IaroshevskaiaF M, KrutovskikhI V, LupanovV P, SidorenkoB A

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
English AbstractA summary of a research paper/publication written in English for a wider audience.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

This study compared the effectiveness of diltiazem and metoprolol in treating chest pain (angina) in 64 patients. Both medications were effective in reducing chest pain caused by exercise, with diltiazem showing a slightly higher success rate (74% vs. 62%). However, diltiazem was more effective than metoprolol in treating chest pain that occurred without exercise (85.7% vs. 50%). The study suggests that diltiazem may be a more versatile treatment option for chest pain compared to metoprolol.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Diltiazem, a new calcium antagonist, and metoprolol, a cardioselective beta-adrenoblocker, were comparatively studied in 53 patients with exertional angina and 11 patients with spontaneous angina. A simple blind random method using placebo, graded physical exercise test employing a bicycle ergometer...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2202852

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）
in preparation
Date :
  1. Date Completed 1990-09-28
  2. Date Revised 2017-03-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2202852

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

2202852

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of angina
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

Russian

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.