Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

An emergency department intervention for linking pediatric suicidal patients to follow-up mental health treatment.

Author: AsarnowJoan Rosenbaum, BaraffLarry J, BerkMichele, CohenDaniel, Devich-NavarroMona, GrobCharles S, PiacentiniJohn C, Rotheram-BorusMary Jane, SuddathRobert, TangLingqi

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch funding provided by the NIH to external research institutions and researchers.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Research funding provided by the Public Health Service (PHS).

Overview

An enhanced emergency department intervention, including a family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy session and care linkage telephone contacts, significantly improved linkage to outpatient mental health treatment for suicidal youths. The intervention group had higher rates of psychotherapy, combined psychotherapy and medication, and psychotherapy visits.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: Suicide is the third leading cause of death among adolescents. Many suicidal youths treated in emergency departments do not receive follow-up treatment as advocated by the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention. Two strategies for improving rates of follow-up treatment were compared. M...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22211209

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Bridging the Gap: Connecting Suicidal Youth with Mental Health Care

The desert of mental health can be a lonely and isolating place, especially for young people struggling with suicidal thoughts. This study investigates an intervention designed to improve access to mental health services for suicidal youth who present to emergency departments (EDs).

Intervention Shows Promise in Linking Youth to Mental Health Care

The study found that the enhanced mental health intervention, which included a family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy session and follow-up telephone contacts, significantly increased the likelihood of youth receiving outpatient mental health treatment. This is a positive finding, suggesting that targeted interventions can help bridge the gap between ED care and ongoing mental health support.

Importance of Access to Mental Health Care

The study highlights the critical need for accessible and effective mental health services, especially for vulnerable populations like suicidal youth. Just as a traveler in the desert needs reliable water sources to survive, individuals struggling with mental health issues need access to support and resources to thrive.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research is like a well-equipped caravan crossing a vast desert, providing essential resources and support to those in need. It emphasizes the importance of early intervention and continued care in addressing the challenges of suicide prevention and mental health care for youth. It reminds us that the desert of mental health is best navigated with compassion, understanding, and access to appropriate resources.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2012-04-24
  2. Date Revised 2022-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22211209

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

NIHMS308725

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of suicide
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.