[Nisoldipine in the therapy of stable exercise angina: evaluation of its efficacy in ergometric tests compared with propranolol].

Author: ArrichielloP, BonaduceD, BreglioR, LanzilloT, MazzaF, MorganoG, PetrettaM

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The safety and efficacy of a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, nisoldipine, were studied in comparison with propranolol, in patients with stable angina. Following 2 weeks of wash-out of the current therapy and 1 week of placebo, 26 patients underwent two cycloergometer tests, before and 2 hour...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2227221

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Nisoldipine vs. Propranolol: A Race Across the Desert of Angina

This study takes us on a thrilling race across the desert of angina, a condition characterized by chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart. The authors are pitting two medications, nisoldipine and propranolol, against each other to see which is more effective in treating stable angina. This research is like a desert camel race, where two powerful steeds compete for victory. The study found that both medications improved exercise tolerance and reduced the severity of angina symptoms, but nisoldipine was associated with less reduction in heart rate, suggesting it might be a better option for patients with certain medical conditions. This research is like finding two different paths across the desert—each leading to a similar destination but with different challenges along the way.

Nisoldipine Shows Promise for Stable Angina

The study found that nisoldipine was equally effective as propranolol in treating stable angina, but with fewer negative effects on heart rate. It's like finding a smoother trail across a desert—a path that leads to the same oasis but with less effort and strain. This research provides valuable insights for physicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment for their patients with angina.

Choosing the Right Angina Treatment

It's crucial to discuss with your doctor the best treatment option for your specific needs. It's like consulting a wise desert guide—their knowledge and experience can help you navigate the complex landscape of angina treatment. This study emphasizes the importance of individualized care and the need to consider all factors before choosing a treatment plan.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of understanding the unique needs of individual patients when choosing a treatment for angina. It's like traversing a desert with multiple routes—finding the right path for each traveler is essential. This research underscores the importance of ongoing scientific exploration and the need for tailored treatment plans that address the complexities of individual cases.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1990-12-13
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2227221

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

2227221

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

Italian

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.