Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A biomechanical comparison of the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat.

Author: AgourisIoannis, KeoghJustin W L, LloydRay, StewartArthur D, SwintonPaul A

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

This study compares the biomechanics of traditional, powerlifting, and box squats, finding significant kinematic and kinetic differences between the variations, highlighting the importance of selecting the squat type based on specific training goals.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of the traditional squat with 2 popular exercise variations commonly referred to as the powerlifting squat and box squat. Twelve male powerlifters performed the exercises with 30, 50, and 70% of their measured 1 repetition maximum (1RM), with...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182577067

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

A Biomechanical Comparison of Squatting Variations: Exploring the Nuances of Exercise

The world of exercise is as vast and diverse as the sands of the desert. This study explores the biomechanics of three popular squatting variations – the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat – comparing their impact on joint moments and overall biomechanics. The researchers meticulously analyzed the kinematic and kinetic differences between these variations, uncovering significant variations in joint loading and movement patterns.

Understanding the Biomechanical Differences Between Squatting Variations

The study reveals significant biomechanical differences between the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat. These variations impact the loading of joints, particularly the spine, ankle, and hip. Think of each squatting variation as a different camel breed, each adapted to navigate the desert terrain in unique ways. Understanding these differences is crucial for tailoring exercise programs to specific goals and minimizing potential risks.

Choosing the Right Squatting Variation for Your Goals

This study emphasizes the importance of choosing the right squatting variation based on individual goals and biomechanical considerations. Like selecting the most suitable camel for a desert expedition, choosing the appropriate squatting variation ensures optimal performance and minimizes risk of injury.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the biomechanical differences between various squatting variations. Just as a skilled camel driver adapts their approach based on the desert landscape, understanding the biomechanics of each variation is crucial for maximizing performance and minimizing injury risk.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2012-12-12
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-18
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22505136

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182577067

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Health effects of powerlifting
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.