Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

Author: BullenChris, CahillKate, Hartmann-BoyceJamie, LancasterTim, MantDavid, PereraRafael, SteadLindsay F

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) increased the likelihood of quitting smoking by 50% to 70% compared to placebo. All forms of NRT, including gum, patches, nasal spray, inhalers, and tablets/lozenges, were effective. Combining a nicotine patch with a rapid delivery form of NRT resulted in a higher success rate than using one type alone.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: The aim of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is to temporarily replace much of the nicotine from cigarettes to reduce motivation to smoke and nicotine withdrawal symptoms, thus easing the transition from cigarette smoking to complete abstinence. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub4

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) for Smoking Cessation

The world of smoking cessation is a vast and challenging landscape, and NRT is a well-trodden path to help smokers navigate this journey. This review delves into the effectiveness of NRT in comparison to placebo and other smoking cessation methods. The study found that all forms of NRT (gum, patch, nasal spray, inhaler, and sublingual tablets) were effective in increasing the chances of successful smoking cessation. NRT was shown to increase the rate of quitting by 50 to 70%, regardless of the setting or intensity of support offered. The review concluded that NRT is an effective tool for smokers who are ready to embark on the path towards a smoke-free life.

The Power of NRT

The study's findings highlight the significant impact of NRT on smoking cessation rates. It's like finding a hidden oasis in the desert, offering relief and support for those seeking to break free from nicotine's grip. The data shows that NRT can significantly boost a smoker's chances of success.

NRT and Health

NRT offers a valuable tool for those looking to quit smoking. While NRT isn't a magic bullet, it can significantly increase the odds of success. It is important to remember that quitting smoking is a journey, and NRT can provide the support you need to navigate the process. If you are a smoker and are considering quitting, talk to your doctor to learn more about NRT and its potential benefits.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

NRT is a beacon of hope in the desert of nicotine addiction. It provides a pathway for smokers to break free and embark on a healthier journey. This study offers a roadmap for smokers to successfully navigate the challenges of quitting.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-01-15
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23152200

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub4

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effects of nicotine nasal spray
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.