Pharmacokinetic and tolerability of i.m. disodium clodronate 200 mg/lidocaine 1%, given twice monthly, in comparison with i.m. disodium clodronate 100 mg/lidocaine 1%, given weekly, in healthy postmenopausal female patients.

Author: BaraldiEnrica, CremonesiGiovanni, LeurattiChiara, MariottiFabrizia, RadicioniMilko

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Clodronate is a bisphosphonate effective in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Non-adherence to bisphosphonates, however, is a major issue in clinical practice. Simplifying dose regimens may increase compliance. OBJECTIVES: To assess bioequivalence bet...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.5414/CP201799

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Exploring the Bioequivalence of Intramuscular Clodronate Formulations

My fellow researchers, we're venturing into the world of [pharmacology] and exploring the bioequivalence of two intramuscular clodronate formulations designed for the treatment of osteoporosis. This study, like a camel caravan traversing a sandy expanse, meticulously compared the two formulations to determine their equivalence in terms of drug absorption and tolerability. The researchers conducted a double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study involving 32 postmenopausal women. They administered single doses of the test and reference formulations and measured clodronic acid excretion in the first 24 hours after injection (Xu0-24h) as the primary endpoint. This careful approach is similar to a desert explorer meticulously measuring the terrain and resources to ensure a safe and successful journey.

The Bioequivalence of Clodronate Formulations

The results confirmed the bioequivalence of the two clodronate formulations, demonstrating that the 200 mg formulation administered twice a month was equivalent to the 100 mg formulation administered weekly in terms of dose-normalized rate and amount of clodronic acid excretion. This is like a desert traveler finding two routes that lead to the same oasis, providing different options for reaching the desired destination. The study also reported favorable local tolerability for both formulations, suggesting that the novel 200 mg formulation may offer a more convenient and effective treatment option.

Implications for Osteoporosis Treatment

The findings hold significant implications for the treatment of osteoporosis, suggesting that reducing the frequency of intramuscular administrations may enhance patient compliance and improve treatment outcomes. This is like a desert traveler finding a shortcut, reducing the journey time and increasing the likelihood of reaching their destination. The study underscores the importance of developing convenient and effective treatment options to optimize patient care.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the bioequivalence and tolerability of different intramuscular clodronate formulations for the treatment of osteoporosis. It highlights the potential for optimizing treatment regimens by reducing the frequency of administrations, thereby enhancing patient adherence and improving treatment outcomes. This research is like a desert oasis, providing a refreshing respite for those seeking relief from the burden of osteoporosis. It reminds us that the pursuit of scientific knowledge and its application can lead to improved healthcare practices and a better quality of life for patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-06-20
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23357844

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.5414/CP201799

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.