Comparison of clindamycin 1% and benzoyl peroxide 5% gel to a novel composition containing salicylic acid, capryloyl salicylic acid, HEPES, glycolic acid, citric acid, and dioic acid in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Author: BaumannLeslie S, DahlAmanda, FiguerasKristian, OresajoChristian, YatskayerMargarita

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
This study evaluated the tolerance and efficacy of 2 facial skin products in subjects with acne using the following acne treatments: 1) treatment A, a combination of salicylic acid, capryloyl salicylic acid, HEPES, glycolic acid, citric acid, and dioic acid, and 2) treatment B (BenzaClin®, clindamyc...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23545907

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Acne Treatment: A Tale of Two Treatments

The quest for clear skin is a universal one, and acne presents a common challenge. This study investigates the efficacy of two facial skin products in treating acne vulgaris. The researchers meticulously compared two different acne treatments: Treatment A, a combination of salicylic acid, capryloyl salicylic acid, HEPES, glycolic acid, citric acid, and dioic acid, and Treatment B, a combination of clindamycin 1% and benzoyl peroxide 5% gel. The study employed a split-face application design, allowing for a direct comparison of the two treatments. The results revealed that both treatments exhibited similar tolerance and efficacy, offering encouraging news for those seeking effective acne solutions.

The Beauty of Comparative Research

The strength of this research lies in its direct comparison of two popular acne treatments. By comparing the effectiveness and side effects of these two approaches, the study provides valuable insights for both dermatologists and patients. This type of comparative research is crucial in guiding treatment decisions and ensuring optimal outcomes.

A Beacon of Hope for Acne Sufferers

For those grappling with acne, this research offers a glimmer of hope. It suggests that there may be multiple effective treatment options available, allowing for personalized approaches based on individual needs and preferences. The results encourage further exploration of both Treatment A and Treatment B, paving the way for more tailored and effective acne management strategies.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Imagine two paths leading to a lush oasis in the desert, my friend. This study shows that both paths can lead to clear skin, offering a welcome relief for those seeking an end to acne.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-09-20
  2. Date Revised 2015-11-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23545907

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

S1545961613P0266X

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.