Evaluation of follow-up strategies for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.

Author: BryantAndrew, ClarkeTilean, GalaalKhadra, NaikRaj

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer and seventh commonest cause of death in women worldwide. Traditionally, many people who have been treated for cancer undergo long-term follow-up in secondary care. However, it has been suggested that the use of routine review may not be effective in imp...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457804/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Follow-Up Strategies for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Navigating the Desert of Post-Treatment Care

Epithelial ovarian cancer, a complex and often challenging disease, requires careful and personalized management, even after completing primary treatment. This research explores the effectiveness of traditional long-term follow-up strategies in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, questioning the value of routine reviews in improving survival, quality of life, and anxiety levels. The researchers review the existing literature on follow-up practices, examining the evidence for the benefits and costs of traditional approaches. They highlight the potential limitations of routine follow-up, suggesting that it may not be as effective or cost-effective as previously thought. The researchers emphasize the need to re-evaluate follow-up strategies, potentially adopting more individualized and evidence-based approaches tailored to individual patient needs and risk factors.

The Shifting Sands of Follow-Up: Rethinking Traditional Approaches

This research challenges traditional approaches to long-term follow-up for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, suggesting that routine reviews may not be the most effective or efficient approach. The researchers advocate for a shift towards more individualized and evidence-based follow-up strategies, potentially utilizing risk-stratification models to identify patients who may benefit most from more frequent monitoring.

Navigating the Desert of Post-Treatment Care: Personalized Solutions

This research offers valuable insights for both patients and healthcare professionals involved in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. It emphasizes the need to re-evaluate traditional follow-up practices, potentially adopting more individualized and evidence-based approaches to ensure the best possible care for patients. This research underscores the importance of ongoing research and innovation in the field of cancer care to optimize patient outcomes and minimize unnecessary burdens.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research serves as a reminder that even long-standing medical practices should be continually evaluated and refined. The researchers' findings encourage a shift towards more individualized and evidence-based approaches to post-treatment care for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, ensuring that each patient receives the most appropriate and effective follow-up strategies.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2015-10-02
  2. Date Revised 2023-09-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

25198378

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC6457804

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.