Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Effects of cognitive processing therapy on PTSD-related negative cognitions in veterans with military sexual trauma.

Author: HollidayRyan, Link-MalcolmJessica, MorrisElizabeth E, SurísAlina

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research funding provided by US government agencies other than the Public Health Service.

Overview

This study found that cognitive processing therapy (CPT) was more effective at reducing negative thoughts (NCs) in veterans with PTSD related to military sexual trauma (MST) compared to present-centered therapy. Participants in the CPT group had significantly lower NC scores after treatment and at follow-up. The study also found a strong link between negative thoughts and PTSD severity. These findings highlight the importance of addressing negative thoughts in PTSD treatment and suggest potential implications for both MST-related and non-MST-related PTSD.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to military sexual trauma (MST) continues to be a priority in veteran populations. Because negative cognitions (NCs) contribute to PTSD severity and treatment, further understanding of how PTSD and related NCs can be addressed and changed within...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00309

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Cognitive Processing Therapy: A Desert Oasis for PTSD Healing

Military sexual trauma (MST) can have a profound impact on veterans, often leading to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related negative cognitions. This study explores the effectiveness of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in addressing PTSD-related negative cognitions in veterans with MST. The researchers, like skilled therapists guiding veterans through the difficult terrain of trauma, compared the outcomes of CPT to those of present-centered therapy. Their findings suggest that CPT can effectively reduce negative cognitions and improve PTSD symptoms in veterans with MST, offering a pathway to healing and recovery.

CPT: A Beacon of Hope in the Desert of Trauma

This study suggests that Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) can be an effective treatment option for veterans with PTSD related to military sexual trauma (MST). It's like finding a beacon of hope in the vast and often treacherous desert of trauma, offering a pathway to healing and recovery.

Healing the Wounds of Trauma

This research highlights the importance of specialized therapies like CPT in addressing the unique challenges faced by veterans with PTSD related to MST. It's like providing a safe and supportive oasis in the desert of trauma, a place where veterans can heal, recover, and rebuild their lives.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study suggests that CPT can be an effective treatment option for veterans with PTSD related to MST, offering a pathway to healing and recovery. It's like finding a beacon of hope in the vast and often treacherous desert of trauma, offering a place of safety and renewal.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2016-09-13
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

25269124

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00309

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.