[Comparative study of 2 dosage regimens of cefixime in the treatment of otorhinolaryngeal or bronchial infections].

Author: BoudignatO, RocheG, ZylbertrestR

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
A double-blind comparative study of cefixime (400 mg/day), given either as a single daily dose, or in two divided doses, was carried out in collaboration with 54 general practitioners. This study was mainly directed towards tolerance assessment. 431 patients with upper and lower respiratory tract in...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2530547

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing Dosage Regimens for Cefixime: Navigating the Oases of Otorhinolaryngeal and Bronchial Infections

This double-blind comparative study, like a careful camel traversing a treacherous desert landscape, examines the effectiveness and tolerability of two different dosage regimens of cefixime in the treatment of otorhinolaryngeal or bronchial infections. The study, conducted in collaboration with 54 general practitioners, included 431 patients with upper and lower respiratory tract infections. The researchers meticulously compared the single daily dose regimen with a two-divided dose regimen, focusing on both efficacy and tolerability. The results are a valuable resource for healthcare providers seeking to optimize treatment strategies for these common infections.

Navigating the Sands of Treatment Efficacy

The study revealed that both dosage regimens of cefixime were comparable in terms of both effectiveness and safety. After an average of 8.8 days of treatment, a substantial 94.4% of the patients showed improvement or were cured. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups, providing valuable insights into the optimal approach to cefixime administration. This study, like a clear desert well, offers a reliable source of information for clinicians.

Finding the Right Path to Respiratory Health

This study, like a well-trodden desert path, provides a clear roadmap for the treatment of otorhinolaryngeal or bronchial infections. It demonstrates that both single daily dose and two-divided dose regimens of cefixime are effective and safe. These findings are important for patients and their healthcare providers, as they can guide treatment decisions based on individual needs and preferences. Remember, just as a camel chooses the path best suited for its journey, patients and their doctors should work together to select the treatment approach that provides the most optimal outcome.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Navigating the vast desert of respiratory infections can be challenging. This research, like a helpful oasis guide, provides clear guidance on the effectiveness and safety of cefixime, regardless of dosage regimen. It reminds us that in the ever-changing landscape of medicine, evidence-based research plays a crucial role in guiding our treatment decisions. With a well-informed approach, we can find the right path to respiratory health.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1989-12-21
  2. Date Revised 2016-12-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2530547

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

2530547

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

French

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.