An indirect comparison and cost per responder analysis of adalimumab, methotrexate and apremilast in the treatment of methotrexate-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Author: BettsKeith A, FriedmanAlan, GanguliArijit, GriffithJenny, SignorovitchJames E, ZhouZheng-Yi

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Apremilast was recently approved for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, no studies compare apremilast with methotrexate or biologic therapies, so its relative comparative efficacy remains unknown. This study compared the response rates and incremental costs per responder ass...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2016.1140026

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cost-Effective Approach

Navigating the complex world of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment, much like navigating a vast desert, requires careful consideration of diverse therapeutic options. This study delves into the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of three commonly used treatments for PsA: adalimumab, methotrexate, and apremilast.

A Cost-Effective Analysis of PsA Treatment

The study compared response rates and incremental costs per responder associated with each treatment option. This analysis, much like a skilled desert navigator assessing different routes, provides valuable insights for making informed decisions about treatment strategies. The study's findings can help clinicians and patients navigate the complex landscape of PsA treatment, finding the most effective and cost-effective path toward optimal outcomes.

Navigating the Desert of PsA Treatment

This study, like a caravan carefully navigating a challenging desert, emphasizes the importance of considering both efficacy and cost-effectiveness in PsA treatment. By providing a comparative analysis of different therapies, the study empowers clinicians and patients to make informed decisions that balance therapeutic benefits with financial considerations. This research, like a wellspring of knowledge in the desert of PsA management, offers valuable insights for improving the lives of those living with this chronic condition.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study offers a valuable roadmap for navigating the complex world of psoriatic arthritis treatment, providing a cost-effective analysis of different therapies. By illuminating the cost per responder associated with each option, this research empowers clinicians and patients to make informed decisions that balance therapeutic benefits with financial considerations, much like a desert traveler choosing the most efficient route across the vast and challenging landscape.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2016-12-13
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-02
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

26743448

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1185/03007995.2016.1140026

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.