Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparisons of regular and on-demand regimen of PED5-Is in the treatment of ED after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Author: DengLinghui, HanPing, LiuLiangren, QiuShi, TangZhuang, WeiQiang, YangLu

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) for erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Results showed that PDE5-Is significantly improved erectile function compared to placebo, with sildenafil being most effective. Regular use of PDE5-Is was more effective than on-demand use, with similar side effect rates.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have been recommended as first line therapy for erectile dysfunction for patients received nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We examed the efficiency of PDE5-Is and considered the optimal application. Systematic search of PubMed, E...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017160/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

A Closer Look at PDE5-Is for Erectile Dysfunction

The realm of erectile dysfunction (ED) is a delicate and often sensitive topic, akin to navigating a delicate sand dune. This study investigates the effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in treating ED after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, a complex surgical procedure. The authors conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 14 studies, a thorough exploration akin to carefully mapping a desert landscape.

PDE5-Is: Navigating the Sands of Erectile Dysfunction

The study reveals that PDE5-Is significantly improve erectile function, much like a skilled navigator charting a safe course through a treacherous desert. Sildenafil emerged as the most effective drug, but with a slightly higher rate of side effects. Tadalafil, on the other hand, had the lowest rate of side effects. Interestingly, the study also found that regular use of PDE5-Is was more effective than on-demand use, a discovery akin to finding a reliable water source that consistently provides hydration.

The Importance of Personalized Treatment

The study highlights the importance of personalized treatment approaches for ED, much like the desert traveler must adapt to the changing landscape. Understanding the potential benefits and risks of different PDE5-Is, as well as the optimal frequency of use, is crucial for successful treatment. By carefully navigating the complex terrain of ED, we can help individuals find their way to a fulfilling and satisfying sexual experience.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of PDE5-Is for treating erectile dysfunction after prostate cancer surgery. The study highlights the importance of personalized treatment approaches, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of both the benefits and risks of different medications. This research, like a well-equipped camel caravan, helps us navigate the challenges of erectile dysfunction and find a path to improved sexual well-being.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2018-07-20
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-02
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

27611008

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC5017160

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of tadalafil
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.