Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

[Comparison of isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine in the treatment of variant angina pectoris. Randomized study].

Author: AschermannM, BultasJ, KaretováD, KozákováM, KölbelF, SimperD

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
English AbstractA summary of a research paper/publication written in English for a wider audience.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

This study compared the effectiveness of isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine in 17 patients with variant angina (chest pain caused by spasms in coronary arteries). Both treatments significantly reduced the number of angina attacks and episodes of ST-segment changes on heart monitoring, both with and without symptoms. Patients also showed improved exercise tolerance. While both medications were effective, three patients experienced severe headaches with isosorbide dinitrate and had to stop the medication. The study concludes that both isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine are effective treatments for variant angina, but patients should be aware of the potential for headaches with isosorbide dinitrate.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
The effects of isosorbide dinitrate single dose 120 mg daily and nifedipine 20 mg twice daily were studied in 17 patients with variant angina pectoris due to coronary artery spasm. After a placebo phase the patients were randomized to treatment with either isosorbide dinitrate or nifedipine. After s...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2805034

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）
in preparation
Date :
  1. Date Completed 1989-12-01
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2805034

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

2805034

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of angina
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

Czech

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.